Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 21496/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,15234) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VAN VELZEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67972/01
SOMOGYI c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 21496/10
In those circumstances the Court found a violation of Article 6 § 1. In Somogyi v. Italy, no. 67972/01, § 66, ECHR 2004-IV, the applicant was sentenced to eight years" imprisonment, although the obligation of the judicial authorities to check whether the defendant had had the opportunity to apprise himself of the proceedings against him had not been fulfilled. - EGMR, 24.11.1994 - 17621/91
KEMMACHE v. FRANCE (No. 3)
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 21496/10
The domestic courts are best placed to interpret and apply rules of substantive and procedural law (see, among many other authorities, Kemmache v. France (no. 3), 24 November 1994, § 44, Series A no. 296-C; most recently, Portyanko v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 24686/12, 6 October 2015). - EGMR, 27.05.2004 - 46549/99
YAVUZ v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 21496/10
In Yavuz v. Austria, no. 46549/99, § 49, 27 May 2004) there had not been any summons sent to the address of the applicant, whereas the judicial authority dealing with the case (the Independent Administrative Panel) had not verified that the applicant was aware of the date of the hearing in a situation in which counsel had specifically requested before the hearing that the applicant be heard in person.