Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 45167/19 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,30552) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ODEBIYI v. PORTUGAL
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 45167/19
Complaints under Article 5 of the Convention 10. The Court being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 114 and 126, 20 March 2018), will examine the applicant's complaints brought under Article 6 of the Convention concerning his deprivation of liberty and the lack of assistance from an interpreter and a lawyer during his interactions with SEF at the airport from the standpoint of Article 5 § 1 c) and f), 5 § 2, and 5 § 3 of the Convention. - EGMR, 24.01.2019 - 76577/13
Italien verurteilt: 18.000 Euro Entschädigung für Amanda Knox
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 45167/19
The domestic courts examined the applicant's allegations regarding this issue (see, a contrario, Knox v. Italy, no. 76577/13, § 186, 24 January 2019) and there is nothing to suggest that the translations were inaccurate. - EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 61800/08
GANI v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 45167/19
Therefore, there was a good reason for the non-attendance of the witnesses during the trial and the authorities cannot be accused of a lack of diligence (see Gani v. Spain, no. 61800/08, § 39, 19 February 2013). - EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 20837/18
ALEXANDRU-RADU LUCA v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 45167/19
In sum, the Court considers that it cannot be said that the measures taken at an earlier stage, viewed overall, weakened the applicant's position to such an extent that the subsequent proceedings aimed at determining the merits of the criminal charge against him were rendered unfair (compare Alexandru-Radu Luca v. Romania, no. 20837/18, § 76, 14 June 2022). - EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 39686/02
ORAL ET ATABAY c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 45167/19
Even considering the total period as a continuous detention, the applicant was ensured prompt and automatic judicial control within a period of time that did not exceed three days and is therefore acceptable (compare McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 47, ECHR 2006-X; and Oral and Atabay v. Turkey, no. 39686/02, § 43, 23 June 2009).