Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 11373/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55637) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RASSOHIN v. MOLDOVA
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Rassohin v. Moldova
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65
DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 11373/05
Where, however, domestic law provides for a right of appeal, the appeal proceedings will be treated as an extension of the trial process and accordingly will be subject to Article 6 (Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 25, Series A no. 11; Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 33, 11 July 2006 and Clionov v. Moldova, no. 13229/04, § 39, 9 October 2007).
- EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 65102/14
DUNAS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
In several previous judgments (see, for instance, Russu v. Moldova, no. 7413/05, §§ 19-28, 13 November 2008; Godorozea, cited above, § 31; Rassohin v. Moldova, no. 11373/05, § 34, 18 October 2011 and Deli v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 42010/06, § 51, 22 October 2019), referring also to the interpretation of the domestic law made by the Plenary Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (see § 15 above), the Court found that in practice the domestic courts do not accept as sufficient evidence the sending of a letter by a court and require proof of delivery.