Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 24254/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56647) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOMASZ KWIATKOWSKI v. POLAND
Art. 6 Abs. 1+6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 57986/00
TUREK c. SLOVAQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 24254/05
The Court had already dealt with the issue of lustration proceedings in Turek v. Slovakia (no. 57986/00, § 115, ECHR 2006-II (extracts)) and in several cases against Poland (see, Matyjek, § 56; Luboch, § 61; Rasmussen, § 43, all cited above). - EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 37469/05
LUBOCH v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 24254/05
The Court notes that the arguments raised by the Government are similar to those already examined and rejected by the Court in previous cases against Poland (see, Matyjek v. Poland, no. 38184/03, § 64, ECHR 2007-V; Luboch v. Poland, no. 37469/05, §§ 69-72, 15 January 2008; Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886/05, §§ 52-55, 28 April 2009; Górny v. Poland, no. 50399/07, § 22, 8 June 2010) and the Government have not submitted any new arguments which would lead the Court to depart from its previous findings. - EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 38886/05
RASMUSSEN v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 24254/05
The Court notes that the arguments raised by the Government are similar to those already examined and rejected by the Court in previous cases against Poland (see, Matyjek v. Poland, no. 38184/03, § 64, ECHR 2007-V; Luboch v. Poland, no. 37469/05, §§ 69-72, 15 January 2008; Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886/05, §§ 52-55, 28 April 2009; Górny v. Poland, no. 50399/07, § 22, 8 June 2010) and the Government have not submitted any new arguments which would lead the Court to depart from its previous findings. - EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 50399/07
GORNY v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 24254/05
The Court notes that the arguments raised by the Government are similar to those already examined and rejected by the Court in previous cases against Poland (see, Matyjek v. Poland, no. 38184/03, § 64, ECHR 2007-V; Luboch v. Poland, no. 37469/05, §§ 69-72, 15 January 2008; Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886/05, §§ 52-55, 28 April 2009; Górny v. Poland, no. 50399/07, § 22, 8 June 2010) and the Government have not submitted any new arguments which would lead the Court to depart from its previous findings.