Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.07.2010 - 5065/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,65122) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HOVHANNISYAN AND SHIROYAN v. ARMENIA
Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Reminder inadmissible Violation of P1-1 Just satisfaction reserved (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.07.2010 - 5065/06
- EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 5065/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2010 - 5065/06
The Court further reiterates that the phrase "subject to the conditions provided for by law" requires in the first place the existence of and compliance with adequately accessible and sufficiently precise and foreseeable domestic legal provisions (see Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, § 110, Series A no. 102; Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 42, Series A no. 296-A; and Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 109, ECHR 2000-I). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2010 - 5065/06
This conclusion makes it unnecessary to ascertain whether a fair balance has been struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 69, Series A no. 52, and Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 62, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2010 - 5065/06
The Court further reiterates that the phrase "subject to the conditions provided for by law" requires in the first place the existence of and compliance with adequately accessible and sufficiently precise and foreseeable domestic legal provisions (see Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, § 110, Series A no. 102; Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 42, Series A no. 296-A; and Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 109, ECHR 2000-I).