Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 17398/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,14548) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TSULAIA v. GEORGIA
Partly struck out of the list;Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 17398/10
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; see also WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 2507/03
AMAT-G LTD AND MEBAGISHVILI v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 17398/10
The Court has established its practice in a number of cases, including those brought against Georgia, concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to have a final court decision enforced (see, amongst many others, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 33-42, ECHR 2002-III, and Amat-G Ltd and Mebaghishvili v. Georgia, no. 2507/03, §§ 45-63, ECHR 2005-VIII).