Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 1158/17, 8405/17, 11040/17, 44031/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.09.2023 - 1158/17, 8405/17, 11040/17, 44031/17 (https://dejure.org/2023,24764)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. September 2023 - 1158/17, 8405/17, 11040/17, 44031/17 (https://dejure.org/2023,24764)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,24764) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GANBAROVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-general (Article 2 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom to leave a country);Violation of Article 13+P4-2-2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GANBAROVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 3 other applications
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 18, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 2 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 1158/17
OTHER COMPLAINTS 19. As concerns the remaining complaints (see paragraph 7 above), having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above (see paragraphs 12 and 15 above), the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of these complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no.47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014). - KAGH, 07.06.2013 - M 22/12
Zustimmung der MAV beim Einsatz von Dienstleistungskräften (Anästhesieteam) - zum …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 1158/17
22/12/2016. - RG, 29.09.1906 - V 22/06
Öffentliche Flüsse
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 1158/17
The Supreme Court 22/06/2016 and the Baku Court of Appeal 23/06/2016. - EGMR, 13.12.2018 - 66650/13
MURSALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 1158/17
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 of PROTOCOL No. 4 TO THE CONVENTION 10. The Court refers to the general principles established in its case-law and set out in Mursaliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan (nos. 66650/13 and 10 others, §§ 29-31, 13 December 2018), which are equally pertinent to the present case.
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 50612/18
MAHMUDOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Alleged violation of article 10 of the convention 22. Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings above (see paragraphs 18 and 21 above), the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the applicant's complaint under Article 10 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Ganbarova and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 1158/17 and 2 others, § 19, 21 September 2023).