Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 18860/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,57660) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SUKHOY v. UKRAINE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 17, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 35 Abs. 4, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed - Non-pecuniary damage - award ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 35091/02
MIKHAÏLENKI ET AUTRES c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 18860/03
The Government raised objections, contested by the applicant, regarding exhaustion of domestic remedies similar to those already dismissed in a number of the Court's judgments regarding non-enforcement against the State-owned companies (see e.g. among many others, Trykhlib v. Ukraine, no. 58312/00, §§ 38-43, 20 September 2005 and Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091/02 and following, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2004-XII). - EGMR, 20.09.2005 - 58312/00
TRYKHLIB v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 18860/03
The Government raised objections, contested by the applicant, regarding exhaustion of domestic remedies similar to those already dismissed in a number of the Court's judgments regarding non-enforcement against the State-owned companies (see e.g. among many others, Trykhlib v. Ukraine, no. 58312/00, §§ 38-43, 20 September 2005 and Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091/02 and following, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2004-XII).