Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RAUSH v. RUSSIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR - 45886/07

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 17767/06

  10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, §§ 259-60, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 17767/06

  The applicant, who has emphasised that in his view there were no domestic remedies to be exhausted, ought therefore to have lodged his application with the Court no later than six months after the end of the events complained of in order to comply with the six-month rule (see, mutatis mutandis, Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 87, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 03.05.2022 - 20506/07

  OSANKIN AND MAZURINA v. RUSSIA

  The Court reiterates that the duty of diligence requires an applicant not only to apply promptly to domestic authorities, but also obliges to undertake elementary steps and seek information from the relevant authorities about the investigation's progress or the lack thereof, as well as to lodge an application with the Court as soon as he or she realises, or ought to have realised, that the investigation is not effective (see Raush v. Russia (dec.), no. 17767/06, §§ 56-67, 22 March 2016).
• EGMR, 26.04.2022 - 17161/11

  ZASSETY AND DONTSOV v. RUSSIA

  Nothing explains two-years period of inaction in lodging an appeal against the above decision, and Mr Zassety did not put forward any explanation as to the origin of that delay (see Raush v. Russia (dec.), no. 17767/06, § 59, 22 March 2016).
• EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 52202/07

  ATAMANOV v. RUSSIA

  In such circumstances the Court considers that the applicant could not be said to have complied with his duty of diligence (mutatis mutandis, Raush v. Russia (dec.), no. 17767/06, § 59, 22 March 2016).
• EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 60890/08

  ISMOGULOV v. RUSSIA

  Nevertheless, this does not relieve an applicant of his own individual obligation to undertake elementary steps and seek information from the relevant authorities about the investigation's progress or the lack thereof (see Raush v. Russia (dec.), no. 17767/06, § 56, 22 March 2016, with further references).