Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 39857/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,65730) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KEMAL KAHRAMAN v. TURKEY
(englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 39857/03
- EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 39857/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 39857/03
The Court notes at the outset that Article 3 enshrines one of the most fundamental values of democratic societies, making no provision for exceptions and with no derogation from it being permissible, as provided by Article 15 § 2 (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V, and Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3288, § 93). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 39857/03
Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 39857/03
A description of the relevant domestic law at the material time can be found in Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-100, ECHR 2004-IV). - EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 39857/03
A description of the relevant domestic law at the material time can be found in Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-100, ECHR 2004-IV). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 39857/03
It also reiterates that where an individual is taken into custody in good health but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused and to produce evidence casting doubt on the victim's allegations, particularly if those allegations were corroborated by medical reports, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni, cited above, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, and Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34).