Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  POROSHIN v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2022 - 70913/12

  As to the merits of the complaint, the Court reiterates that (1) covert surveillance measures, including video and audio recording of private communications, amount to an interference with the right to respect for private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, and (2) such interference is to be "in accordance with the law" and "necessary in a democratic society", for one of the purposes enumerated in Article 8 § 2 (see, for example, Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 72, 10 March 2009).
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 37717/05

  Die Kommunikation mit dem Verteidiger darf nicht abgehört werden, egal wann

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2022 - 70913/12

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Akhlyustin v. Russia, no. 21200/05, 7 November 2017, Zubkov and Others, cited above, Dudchenko v. Russia, no. 37717/05, 7 November 2017, Moskalev v. Russia, no. 44045/05, 7 November 2017 and Konstantin Moskalev v. Russia, no. 59589/10, 7 November 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 21200/05

  AKHLYUSTIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2022 - 70913/12

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Akhlyustin v. Russia, no. 21200/05, 7 November 2017, Zubkov and Others, cited above, Dudchenko v. Russia, no. 37717/05, 7 November 2017, Moskalev v. Russia, no. 44045/05, 7 November 2017 and Konstantin Moskalev v. Russia, no. 59589/10, 7 November 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.

 
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 29431/05

  ZUBKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2022 - 70913/12

  Even though the Court has already established, in earlier cases against Russia, that no effective remedy is available to the applicants, as regards the complaints similar to the one under examination (see, for example, Zubkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 29431/05 and 2 others, §§ 85-99, 7 November 2017), it discerns nothing in the materials submitted to suggest that the applicant was aware or should have become aware of the futility of such remedy.
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 59589/10

  KONSTANTIN MOSKALEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2022 - 70913/12

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Akhlyustin v. Russia, no. 21200/05, 7 November 2017, Zubkov and Others, cited above, Dudchenko v. Russia, no. 37717/05, 7 November 2017, Moskalev v. Russia, no. 44045/05, 7 November 2017 and Konstantin Moskalev v. Russia, no. 59589/10, 7 November 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 44045/05

  MOSKALEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.05.2022 - 70913/12

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Akhlyustin v. Russia, no. 21200/05, 7 November 2017, Zubkov and Others, cited above, Dudchenko v. Russia, no. 37717/05, 7 November 2017, Moskalev v. Russia, no. 44045/05, 7 November 2017 and Konstantin Moskalev v. Russia, no. 59589/10, 7 November 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.