Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 31757/23 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2024,7696) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NEMCSOK v. HUNGARY
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.04.2021 - 47621/13
Impfpflicht in Tschechien: Impflicht für Kinder ist keine …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 31757/23
The Court reiterates that compulsory vaccination, as an involuntary medical intervention, represents an interference with the right to respect for private life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention (see Vav?™icka and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 47621/13 and 5 others, § 263, 8 April 2021, and Solomakhin v. Ukraine, no. 24429/03, § 33, 15 March 2012, with further references). - EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 31757/23
As regards the applicant's complaint under Article 2 of the Convention concerning the authorities' decision to allow exemption only from some contraindicated vaccines, the Court, being master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018) finds it appropriate to examine it rather from the perspective of the right to respect for private life as protected by Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (see, a fortiori, Baytüre and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3270/09, § 26, 12 March 2013). - EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 3270/09
BAYTÜRE c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 31757/23
As regards the applicant's complaint under Article 2 of the Convention concerning the authorities' decision to allow exemption only from some contraindicated vaccines, the Court, being master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018) finds it appropriate to examine it rather from the perspective of the right to respect for private life as protected by Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (see, a fortiori, Baytüre and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3270/09, § 26, 12 March 2013).