Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MANZITTI AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99

  PEREZ c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 39282/22

  The Court considers that the efforts of the national legislator to provide preventive remedies such as those created to address the excessive length of proceedings in civil matters do not restrict the defence rights of applicants to submit any observations that they consider relevant to their case (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 80, ECHR 2004-I) or the right to adversarial proceedings involving the opportunity for the parties to learn of the observations or evidence produced by the other party and to make submissions in that regard (see Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289/11, § 71, 19 September 2017).
• EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 48762/19

  BIELINSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 39282/22

  When necessary, States are requested to increase resources in response to unreasonable delays and to take a range of legislative, organisational, budgetary and other measures (see Bieli?„ski v. Poland, no. 48762/19, § 44, 21 July 2022).
• EGMR, 25.02.2016 - 17708/12

  OLIVIERI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 39282/22

  The Court notes that the general principles on excessive length of proceedings and domestic remedies have been outlined in Olivieri and Others v. Italy, (nos. 17708/12 and 3 others, §§ 39-47, 25 February 2016).

 
• EGMR, 28.04.2022 - 15566/13

  VERRASCINA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 39282/22

  In the applications at stake, the Court finds that the requirement imposed by Article 1 ter paragraph 1 of the Pinto Act can be considered to be in compliance with Article 13 firstly because the remedies it refers to are capable of hastening a decision on cases before the competent tribunal, and secondly because it merely sets out a condition that should be complied with in order for a request for compensation to be examined by the judicial authorities (see Verrascina and Others v. Italy, nos. 15566/13 and 5 others, § 29, 28 April 2022).
• EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 65540/16

  ATANASOV AND APOSTOLOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 39282/22

  65540/16 and 22368/17, § 69, 27 June 2017).
• EGMR, 21.03.2023 - 54421/21

  SZAXON v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 39282/22

  In view of the close link between that provision and Article 13 of the Convention, the Court's finding above is equally valid within the context of this complaint (see Szaxon v. Hungary (dec.), no. 54421/21, § 51, 21 March 2023).