Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DOROSHENKO v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of P4-2 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 1328/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case; and the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

  Neumeister ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 1328/04

  "A concern for speed cannot dispense... judges in the system of criminal procedure... from taking every measure likely to throw light on the truth or falsehood of the charges" (see Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, p. 43, § 21, Series A no. 8).

• EGMR, 10.11.2011 - 55865/07

  SVERCHKOV AND SVERCHKOVA v. UKRAINE

  It considers that the responsibility for these delays rested with the domestic courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Fedina v. Ukraine, no. 17185/02, § 80, 2 September 2010; and Doroshenko v. Ukraine, no. 1328/04, § 41, 26 May 2011).
• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 25851/06

  LYUBART-SANGUSHKO v. UKRAINE

  It also recalls that an accused in criminal proceedings should be entitled to have his case conducted with special diligence, having a particular regard to any restrictions on liberty imposed pending the conclusion of the proceedings (see, for instance, Doroshenko v. Ukraine, no. 1328/04, § 41, 26 May 2011).
• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 5842/05

  ORLOV v. UKRAINE

  It also recalls that an accused in criminal proceedings should be entitled to have his case conducted with special diligence, having a particular regard to any restrictions on liberty imposed pending the conclusion of the proceedings (see, for instance, Doroshenko v. Ukraine, no. 1328/04, § 41, 26 May 2011).
• EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 18412/05

  YAKOVLEV v. UKRAINE

  The Court further notes that an accused in criminal proceedings should be entitled to have his case conducted with special diligence, having particular regard to any restrictions on liberty imposed pending the conclusion of the proceedings (see Doroshenko v. Ukraine, no. 1328/04, § 41, 26 May 2011, with further references).