Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.03.2003 - 72219/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,56144) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64
Wemhoff ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2003 - 72219/01
However, the latter requirement of expedition must not stand in the way of the efforts of the judges to clarify fully the facts in issue, to give both the defence and the prosecution all facilities for putting forward their evidence and stating their cases and to pronounce judgment only after careful reflection on whether the offences were in fact committed and on the sentence (Wemhoff v. Germany, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, § 17). - EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86
LETELLIER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2003 - 72219/01
Where such grounds are "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, § 35). - EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 39360/98
S.B.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.03.2003 - 72219/01
Accordingly, in cases concerning former section 25 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, the Court found that any consideration by a Magistrate of an accused's pre-trial release on bail had been excluded in advance by the legislature by section 25 and that such removal of the judicial control over pre-trial detention amounted to a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see, for example, S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 39360/98, §§ 22-23, to be published in ECHR-2001).