Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EGE v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 10.02.2004 - 47117/99
• EGMR, 29.03.2005 - 47117/99

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2005 - 47117/99

  Consequently, there is no justification for making any award to him under that head (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 164, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2005 - 47117/99

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 29279/95

  SAHINER v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2005 - 47117/99

  A description of the relevant domestic law and practice can be found in Sahiner c. Turquie, no 29279/95, CEDH 2001-IX.

• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 14129/11

  INAN v. TURKEY

  It further reiterates that, according to the established case-law of the Court, where no domestic remedy is available the six-month period runs from the date of the act alleged to constitute a violation of the Convention (see Ege v. Turkey (dec.), no. 47117/99, 10 February 2004, and DoÄ?an v. Turkey (dec.), no. 67214/01, 7 June 2005).