Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 16275/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,65376) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GÜLSENOGLU v. TURKEY
Art. 2 MRK
Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 16275/02
The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-47). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 16275/02
The circumstances in which deprivation of life may be justified must therefore be strictly construed (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94
TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 16275/02
The Court further recalls that, according to its case-law, the obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, §§ 101 and 103, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98
VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 16275/02
Article 2, which safeguards the right to life and sets out the circumstances when deprivation of life may be justified, ranks as one of the most fundamental provisions in the Convention, from which no derogation is permitted (see Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 68, ECHR 2000-VI). - EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 27602/95
ULKU EKINCI v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 16275/02
It must be assessed on the basis of all relevant facts and with regard to the practical realities of investigation work (see Velikova, cited above, § 80; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 144, 16 July 2002).