Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOKALARI v. ALBANIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  It thus finds that there is no need to give a separate ruling on these complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 38222/02

  RAMADHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  Those proceedings were decisive for the determination of that claim of a civil nature (see Ramadhi and Others v. Albania, no. 38222/02, §§ 35-37, 13 November 2007).
• EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 29026/06

  BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  29026/06 and 11 others, § 44, 17 March 2020).

 
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 5250/07

  BICI CONTRE L' ALBANIE ET 1 AUTRE AFFAIRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  Having regard to the Government's submissions, in the specific circumstances of the case the Court is satisfied that the complaint is not incompatible ratione materiae or personae as to the period between 2012 and early 2019 (see, in the same vein, Bici v. Albania, no. 5250/07, §§ 6-11 and 28-29, 3 December 2015; Luli and Others, § 89; and Ramadhi and Others, §§ 35-37, both cited above).
• EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 7352/03

  BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  It is common ground between the parties that (i) as to Article 6 of the Convention, those proceedings concerned a "right" which could and still can be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under Albanian law (see Manushaqe Puto and Others v. Albania, nos. 604/07 and 3 others, §§ 24-29, 31 July 2012, and Beshiri and Others v. Albania, no. 7352/03, §§ 20-28, 22 August 2006); (ii) after becoming legal heirs in the line of succession vis-à-vis persons who had been claimants in the pending administrative proceedings, the applicants clearly had an interest in respect of the subject-matter of those proceedings and their outcome, and (iii) they joined them as claimants and not merely as other people's (other heirs') representatives.
• EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 64480/09

  LULI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  64480/09 and 5 others, §§ 20-21, 84 and 89, 1 April 2014).
• EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 43391/18

  BARA AND KOLA v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  Also, while not disregarding the understandable delay stemming from the respondent State's decision to implement a comprehensive legislative scheme for the restitution of or compensation for confiscated property and the significant docket of applications before the competent administrative authorities, it remains that it is for the Contracting States to organise their legal systems in such a way that those authorities meet the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention (see Bici, cited above, § 44, and, mutatis mutandis, Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 70, 12 October 2021).
• EGMR - 79950/13 (anhängig)

  CABAJ v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  Thus, the Court has previously calculated the length of "proceedings" - to which the "reasonable time" requirement applied - with reference to the time when applicants challenged, before another administrative authority or a court, an administrative decision taken on their claims, that is when a "dispute" relating to a right arose (see Wcislo and Cabaj v. Poland, nos. 49725/11 and 79950/13, § 173, 8 November 2018; compare Luli and Others v. Albania, nos.
• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 46371/18

  OMDAHL v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  The proceedings concerned the actual existence and scope of the right, namely as regards proprietary claims over the same plots of land asserted by several heirs, including the applicants (compare Omdahl v. Norway, no. 46371/18, § 47, 22 April 2021).