Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BARA AND KOLA v. ALBANIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BARA v. ALBANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

  Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 43391/18

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, amongst many authorities, Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 128, ECHR 2006-VII).
• EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 44920/09

  Studio Monitori et.al. gegen Georgien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 43391/18

  44920/09 and 8942/10, § 32, 30 January 2020).

• EGMR, 07.05.2024 - 24228/18

  BIBA v. ALBANIA

  These remedies should in principle be exhausted before bringing a complaint about the length of proceedings to the Court (see Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 119, 12 October 2021).
• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 21141/20

  BALA v. ALBANIA

  General principles 56. The Court reiterates at the outset that Article 8 does not guarantee, as such, a right to be appointed to a post or position in public service (see Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 55, 12 October 2021, and Frezadou v. Greece, no. 2683/12, § 28, 8 November 2018; see also Lorenzo Bragado and Others v. Spain, nos.
• EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 41151/20

  ALTIUS INSURANCE LTD v. CYPRUS

  The relevant principles relating to the application of Article 13 of the Convention to complaints of a violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time are set out in a number of judgments (see, among other authorities, Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 105, 12 October 2021; McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 108, 10 September 2010; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 97-101, ECHR 2006-VII; Scordino (no. 1), cited above, §§ 182-89; and Kud?‚a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).

 
• EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 22493/12

  KOKALARI v. ALBANIA

  Also, while not disregarding the understandable delay stemming from the respondent State's decision to implement a comprehensive legislative scheme for the restitution of or compensation for confiscated property and the significant docket of applications before the competent administrative authorities, it remains that it is for the Contracting States to organise their legal systems in such a way that those authorities meet the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention (see Bici, cited above, § 44, and, mutatis mutandis, Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 70, 12 October 2021).
• EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 53488/15

  BECCHETTI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Furthermore, the practice of the Constitutional Court, in particular, includes the possibility of review of factual situations that might affect constitutional rights, such as claims of excessive length of judicial proceedings (see Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 35, 12 October 2021).
• EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 18952/18

  GLOVELI v. GEORGIA

  The Court considers that the dispute was "genuine" and "serious" as it concerned the fairness of the judicial selection and appointment procedure and could lead to the annulment of the contested decision and the reconsideration of the applicant's application for the post (see Dolinska-Ficek and Ozimek, § 232, Juricic, § 52, and Tsanova-Gecheva, § 84, all cited above; see also Fiume v. Italy, no. 20774/05, § 35, 30 June 2009, and Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 58, 12 October 2021).
• EGMR - 39860/19 (anhängig)

  ARB SH.P.K. v. ALBANIA and 4 other applications

  of the CCP As regards the domestic complaint about the length of proceedings, the procedure is divided into two principal phases: (i) a finding of a violation of the "reasonable time" requirement and, subject to the relevant conditions, (ii) the determination of damages to be paid to the complainant (see Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, § 111, 12 October 2021).
• EGMR - 385/22 (anhängig)

  BUZALLI v. ALBANIA

  Has there been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the length of the criminal proceedings before the Supreme Court (see Bara and Kola v. Albania, nos. 43391/18 and 17766/19, §§ 63-73 and 85-97, 12 October 2021, with further references)?.
• EGMR - 6045/14 (anhängig)

  LASKU AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  43391/18 and 17766/19, § 63, 12 October 2021)? Did the applicants exhaust domestic remedies, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, following the Constitutional Court's decision acknowledging their complaint about the length of proceedings, were the applicants required to lodge proceedings for compensation, either in a separate action under the Code of Civil Procedure or by any other compensatory remedy?.