Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.08.1999 - 45367/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,27557) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GRÖCHENIG v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9120/80
UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.1999 - 45367/99
It seems appropriate in the instant case to look at the applicants' complaints from the points of view of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of Article 6 taken together, especially as the guarantees in paragraphs 2 and 3 represent aspects of the concept of a fair trial contained in paragraph 1 (see, inter alia, the Unterpertinger v. Austria judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 110, p. 14, § 29). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.08.1999 - 45367/99
As regards the applicant's complaints about the criminal courts' taking of evidence and its evaluation, the Court recalls that, as a general rule, it is for the national courts to assess the evidence before them as well as the relevance of the evidence which defendants seek to adduce (see the Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 33).