Auszug aus EGMR - 14175/16

On account of the manner of interrogation of the second applicant, has he been liable to be tried twice for the same offence in the territory of the respondent State, as prohibited by Article 4 § 1 of Protocol No. 7 (see inter alia Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, ECHR 2009)?.

Auszug aus EGMR - 14175/16

In respect of the second applicant, was the length of the criminal proceedings in breach of the "reasonable time" requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see inter alia Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II)?.

Auszug aus EGMR - 14175/16

Did the first applicant's conviction by the Supreme Court constitute a breach of his right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, did the Supreme Court assess the first applicant's guilt, in whole or in part, on the basis of testimony provided by the accused and witnesses before the District Court without the Supreme Court having itself directly heard the accused or the witnesses in question (see inter alia Sigurór Arnarsson v. Iceland, no. 44671/98, 15 July 2003 and Botten v. Norway, 19 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I)? Furthermore, did the national courts adequately reason their conclusions in the applicant's case (see inter alia Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 84, 11 July 2017 and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I)?.