Rechtsprechung
   EGMR - 25182/22   

Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/9999,152203
EGMR - 25182/22 (https://dejure.org/9999,152203)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,152203) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 19986/06

    ILBEYI KEMALOGLU AND MERIYE KEMALOGLU v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR - 25182/22
    Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life, was the manner in which the legal mechanisms were applied in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention (see Ciecho?„ska v. Poland, no. 19776/04, § 67, 14 June 2011; Ilbeyi Kemaloglu and Meriye Kemaloglu v. Turkey, no. 19986/06, §§ 42-43, 10 April 2012; Bilbija et Bla?¾evic v. Croatia, no. 62870/13, § 110, 12 January 2016; Fergec v. Croatia, no. 68516/14, § 40, 9 May 2017, and Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, §§ 235-238, 19 December 2017)?.
  • EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 62870/13

    BILBIJA AND BLAZEVIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR - 25182/22
    Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life, was the manner in which the legal mechanisms were applied in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention (see Ciecho?„ska v. Poland, no. 19776/04, § 67, 14 June 2011; Ilbeyi Kemaloglu and Meriye Kemaloglu v. Turkey, no. 19986/06, §§ 42-43, 10 April 2012; Bilbija et Bla?¾evic v. Croatia, no. 62870/13, § 110, 12 January 2016; Fergec v. Croatia, no. 68516/14, § 40, 9 May 2017, and Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, §§ 235-238, 19 December 2017)?.
  • EGMR, 09.05.2017 - 68516/14

    FERGEC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR - 25182/22
    Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life, was the manner in which the legal mechanisms were applied in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention (see Ciecho?„ska v. Poland, no. 19776/04, § 67, 14 June 2011; Ilbeyi Kemaloglu and Meriye Kemaloglu v. Turkey, no. 19986/06, §§ 42-43, 10 April 2012; Bilbija et Bla?¾evic v. Croatia, no. 62870/13, § 110, 12 January 2016; Fergec v. Croatia, no. 68516/14, § 40, 9 May 2017, and Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, §§ 235-238, 19 December 2017)?.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht