Rechtsprechung
   EGMR - 29902/20, 54212/20   

Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/9999,151521
EGMR - 29902/20, 54212/20 (https://dejure.org/9999,151521)
EGMR - 29902/20, Entscheidung vom 54212/20 (https://dejure.org/9999,151521)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,151521) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 07.10.1988 - 10519/83

    SALABIAKU c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR - 29902/20
    Was the presumption of innocence, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, respected in the present applications? In particular, did the domestic courts apply presumptions against the applicants in considering that the crime committed by them was still ongoing even after their arrest, with a reversal of the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defence (Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, §§ 27-28, Series A no. 141-A; Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, § 77, Series A no. 146; Telfner v. Austria, no. 33501/96, § 15, 20 March 2001; and Klouvi v. France, no. 30754/03, § 41, 30 June 2011)?.
  • EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83

    BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EGMR - 29902/20
    Was the presumption of innocence, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, respected in the present applications? In particular, did the domestic courts apply presumptions against the applicants in considering that the crime committed by them was still ongoing even after their arrest, with a reversal of the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defence (Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, §§ 27-28, Series A no. 141-A; Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, § 77, Series A no. 146; Telfner v. Austria, no. 33501/96, § 15, 20 March 2001; and Klouvi v. France, no. 30754/03, § 41, 30 June 2011)?.
  • EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 45771/99

    VEEBER v. ESTONIA (No. 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR - 29902/20
    29295/95 and 29363/95, §§ 31-37, ECHR 2001-II; and Veeber v. Estonia (no. 2), no. 45771/99, § 30-39, ECHR 2003-I)? In particular, were the elements of the offences, including the "tempus commissi delicti", clearly set out in the indictment?.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht