Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 02.09.1991 - 15517/89 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
G. v. AUSTRIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65
RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 02.09.1991 - 15517/89
The Commission recalls that the presence of civil servants in a Regional Real Property Transactions Authority is in principle compatible with the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Sramek judgment of 22 October 1984, Series A no. 84, p. 10, para. 41; Eur. Court H.R., Ringeisen judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, pp. 39-40, paras. 95-97).The absence of a public hearing before an administrative authority which determines civil rights is covered by the Austrian reservation concerning Article 6 (Art. 6) (Eur. Court H.R., Ringeisen judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, pp. 40-41, para. 98; Eur. Court H.R., Ettl and others judgment of 23 April 1987, p. 19, paras. 42-43).
- EGMR, 22.10.1984 - 8790/79
Sramek ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EKMR, 02.09.1991 - 15517/89
Court H.R. Series A no. 84, p. 31).The Commission recalls that the presence of civil servants in a Regional Real Property Transactions Authority is in principle compatible with the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Sramek judgment of 22 October 1984, Series A no. 84, p. 10, para. 41; Eur. Court H.R., Ringeisen judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, pp. 39-40, paras. 95-97).
- EGMR, 23.04.1987 - 9316/81
Lechner und Hess ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EKMR, 02.09.1991 - 15517/89
1 (Art. 6-1) does not require that in administrative proceedings dealing with civil rights there must be an independent and impartial tribunal at first instance, and it is therefore not excluded that such administrative proceedings precede the determination of civil rights by a tribunal (Ettl and others v. Austria, Comm. Report 3.10.85, paras. 77-78, p. 25, Eur. Court H.R., Series A no. 117, p. 23; Sramek v. Austria, Comm.