Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 24723/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PATEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EKMR, 06.07.1982 - 9285/81
X., Y. et Z. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 24723/94
The present case may raise an issue under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention for, whilst the Convention does not guarantee a right, as such, to enter or remain in a particular country, the Commission has constantly held that the exclusion of a person from a country where his close relatives reside may raise an issue under this provision (e.g. No. 7816/77, Dec. 19.5.77, D.R. 9, p.219; No. 9088/80, Dec. 6.3.82, D.R. 28, p. 160, and No. 9285/81, Dec. 8.7.82, D.R. 29, p. 205).Whether the removal or exclusion of a family member from a Contracting State is incompatible with the requirements of Article 8 (Art. 8) will depend of a number of factors: the extent to which family life is effectively ruptured, whether there are obstacles to establishing family life in either of the spouses' home countries, whether there are special reasons why that could not be expected of them, whether there are factors of immigration control or considerations of public order (see Eur. Court H.R. Abdulaziz judgment referred to above at para. 68, Berrehab judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, para. 29, Gül judgment of 19 February 1996, Reports, para. 42 and No. 9285/81 Dec. 6.7.82, D.R. 29 p. 205).
- EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80
ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 24723/94
The Court has held that Article 8 (Art. 8) does not impose a general obligation on States to respect the choice of residence of a married couple of the country of their matrimonial residence or to accept non- national spouses for settlement in that country (Eur. Court H.R., Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 94, para. 68). - EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10730/84
BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 24723/94
Whether the removal or exclusion of a family member from a Contracting State is incompatible with the requirements of Article 8 (Art. 8) will depend of a number of factors: the extent to which family life is effectively ruptured, whether there are obstacles to establishing family life in either of the spouses' home countries, whether there are special reasons why that could not be expected of them, whether there are factors of immigration control or considerations of public order (see Eur. Court H.R. Abdulaziz judgment referred to above at para. 68, Berrehab judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, para. 29, Gül judgment of 19 February 1996, Reports, para. 42 and No. 9285/81 Dec. 6.7.82, D.R. 29 p. 205). - EKMR, 19.05.1977 - 7816/77
X. et Y. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 24723/94
The present case may raise an issue under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention for, whilst the Convention does not guarantee a right, as such, to enter or remain in a particular country, the Commission has constantly held that the exclusion of a person from a country where his close relatives reside may raise an issue under this provision (e.g. No. 7816/77, Dec. 19.5.77, D.R. 9, p.219; No. 9088/80, Dec. 6.3.82, D.R. 28, p. 160, and No. 9285/81, Dec. 8.7.82, D.R. 29, p. 205). - EKMR, 06.03.1982 - 9088/80
X. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 24723/94
The present case may raise an issue under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention for, whilst the Convention does not guarantee a right, as such, to enter or remain in a particular country, the Commission has constantly held that the exclusion of a person from a country where his close relatives reside may raise an issue under this provision (e.g. No. 7816/77, Dec. 19.5.77, D.R. 9, p.219; No. 9088/80, Dec. 6.3.82, D.R. 28, p. 160, and No. 9285/81, Dec. 8.7.82, D.R. 29, p. 205).