Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 26998/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,26466) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ADEGBIE v. AUSTRIA
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 20.03.1991 - 15576/89
CRUZ VARAS ET AUTRES c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 26998/95
The Commission recalls that the expulsion by a Contracting State of an individual may give rise to an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment prohibited by the said Article 3 (Art. 3) in the country to which he or she is to be expelled (see No. 12122/86, Dec. 16.10.86, D.R. 50, p. 268; Eur. Court H.R., Cruz Varas judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 28, paras. 69-70; Vilvarajah and Others judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 34, para. 103). - EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87
VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 26998/95
The Commission recalls that the expulsion by a Contracting State of an individual may give rise to an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment prohibited by the said Article 3 (Art. 3) in the country to which he or she is to be expelled (see No. 12122/86, Dec. 16.10.86, D.R. 50, p. 268; Eur. Court H.R., Cruz Varas judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 28, paras. 69-70; Vilvarajah and Others judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 34, para. 103). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 26998/95
The Commission recalls that with regard to the allegation of treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention, a complaint to the Independent Administrative Panel (Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat) concerning the exercise of direct administrative authority and coercion constitutes a sufficient and effective remedy for the purpose of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention (see No. 18896/91, Dec. 20.10.93, unpublished; No. 23829/94, Dec. 17.5.95, unpublished). - EKMR, 16.10.1986 - 12122/86
L. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 26998/95
The Commission recalls that the expulsion by a Contracting State of an individual may give rise to an issue under Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment prohibited by the said Article 3 (Art. 3) in the country to which he or she is to be expelled (see No. 12122/86, Dec. 16.10.86, D.R. 50, p. 268; Eur. Court H.R., Cruz Varas judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 28, paras. 69-70; Vilvarajah and Others judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 34, para. 103). - EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 23829/94
OVIAWE v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 26998/95
The Commission recalls that with regard to the allegation of treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention, a complaint to the Independent Administrative Panel (Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat) concerning the exercise of direct administrative authority and coercion constitutes a sufficient and effective remedy for the purpose of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention (see No. 18896/91, Dec. 20.10.93, unpublished; No. 23829/94, Dec. 17.5.95, unpublished).