Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PACELLA v. ITALY

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EKMR, 27.02.1995 - 15488/89

  DELLO PREITE v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 39217/98

  The Commission recalls that a debt can constitute a "possession" for the creditor (No. 15488/89, Dec. 27.2.95, D.R. 80-B, p. 14).

  In this respect, the Commission notes that the circumstances of the present case differ from the case where an individual is entitled to a tax credit of a fixed amount (see the above-cited No. 15488/89, Dec. 27.2.95, D.R. 80-B, p. 14).

• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 39217/98

  The second and third rules, which are concerned with particular instances of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property, are to be construed in the light of the general principle laid down in the first rule (see, inter alia, Eur. Court HR, Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, para. 33; Eur. Court HR, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 24, para. 61).

  The Commission recalls that, for the purpose of the latter provision, it must be determined whether a fair balance was struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (Eur. Court HR, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 24, para. 69).

• EKMR, 20.01.1986 - 10801/84

  L. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 39217/98

  5 presupposes that a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 has been established, either by a domestic authority or by the Convention organs (No. 10801/84, Dec. 3.10.88, D.R. 61, p. 62; No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 213).

 
• EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 27770/95

  PELUSO contre l'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 39217/98

  1, considers that a length of about one year and five months cannot be regarded as excessive (see, for example, mutatis mutandis, No. 27770/95, Dec. 18.10.95, unpublished; No. 29151/95, Dec. 26.6.96, unpublished).
• EKMR, 26.06.1996 - 29151/95

  FIORDIGIGLIO contre l'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 39217/98

  1, considers that a length of about one year and five months cannot be regarded as excessive (see, for example, mutatis mutandis, No. 27770/95, Dec. 18.10.95, unpublished; No. 29151/95, Dec. 26.6.96, unpublished).
• EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89

  MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 39217/98

  1 applies to the proceedings in question (see Eur. Court HR, Georgiadis v. Greece judgment of 29 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III, pp. 958 and 959, paras. 27-36, and, a contrario, Eur. Court HR, Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327-A, pp. 17-20, paras. 44-52), the Commission, in the light of its case-law on Article 6 para.
• EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91

  PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 39217/98

  The second and third rules, which are concerned with particular instances of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property, are to be construed in the light of the general principle laid down in the first rule (see, inter alia, Eur. Court HR, Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, para. 33; Eur. Court HR, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 24, para. 61).
• EKMR, 04.03.1980 - 7950/77

  X., Y. et Z. c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 39217/98

  5 presupposes that a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 has been established, either by a domestic authority or by the Convention organs (No. 10801/84, Dec. 3.10.88, D.R. 61, p. 62; No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 213).