Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 04.03.1980 - 7950/77 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1980,11416) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
X., Y. and Z. v. AUSTRIA
Art. 5, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 13 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
X., Y. et Z. c. AUTRICHE
Art. 5, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 13 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (10)
- EKMR, 28.02.1996 - 25338/94
A. R. v. DENMARK
5 (Art. 5-5) does not arise (cf. No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 213). - EKMR, 14.04.1994 - 22761/93
R.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
The right to compensation under this provision presupposes that a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 (Art. 5) has been established either by a domestic authority or by the Convention organs (see eg. No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 213). - EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 39217/98
PACELLA v. ITALY
5 presupposes that a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 has been established, either by a domestic authority or by the Convention organs (No. 10801/84, Dec. 3.10.88, D.R. 61, p. 62; No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 213).
- EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28022/95
SINGH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
1 to 4 (Art. 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4), the Commission recalls that the right to compensation under this provision presupposes that a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 (Art. 5) has been established either by a domestic organ or by the Convention organs (see eg. No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 213). - EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28023/95
SINGH VIRK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
1 to 4 (Art. 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4), the Commission recalls that the right to compensation under this provision presupposes that a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 (Art. 5) has been established either by a domestic organ or by the Convention organs (see eg. No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 213). - EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 28188/95
TYRRELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
5 (Art. 5-5) of the Convention, the Commission recalls that the right to compensation under this provision presupposes that a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 (Art. 5) has been established either by a domestic organ or by the Convention organs (see eg. No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19 p. 213). - EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 17971/91
PEUTL v. AUSTRIA
The Commission previously considered that where no other remedy is available to challenge the lawfulness of detention on remand, the proceedings under this Act form part of the domestic remedies to be exhausted under Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention (No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19 p. 213, at p. 216). - EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 21820/93
K.B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
5 (Art. 5-5) of the Convention presupposes that a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 (Art. 5) has been established either by a domestic organ or by the Convention organs (see eg. No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 213). - EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 22640/93
HALL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
The right to compensation under this provision presupposes that a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 (Art. 5) has been established either by a domestic organ or by the Convention organs (see eg. No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 213). - EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 36589/97
ÖZGÜL v. TURKEY
1 to 4 (Art. 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4) has been established either directly or in substance (No. 7950/77, Dec. 4.3.80, D.R. 19, p. 215).