Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 13.01.1992 - 15435/89 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1992,20981) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BRITTING v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1992 - 15435/89
1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention has been complied with, it must examine the proceedings as a whole once they have been concluded (cf., inter alia, No. 9938/82, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48 p. 21, No. 7945/77, Dec. 4.7.78, D.R. 14 p. 228). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1992 - 15435/89
In particular, it is not their function to deal with errors of fact or of law allegedly committed by a national court unless and insofar as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Schenk judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29 para. 45). - EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85
KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1992 - 15435/89
It is therefore not for the Commission to decide whether or not domestic courts have correctly assessed evidence unless there is an indication that the judge has drawn grossly unfair or arbitrary conclusions from the facts before him (cf., inter alia, Eur. Court H.R., Kostovski judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 166, p. 19 para. 39; No. 9000/80, Dec. 11.3.82, D.R. 28 pp. 127, 134). - EKMR, 04.07.1978 - 7945/77
X. v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1992 - 15435/89
1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention has been complied with, it must examine the proceedings as a whole once they have been concluded (cf., inter alia, No. 9938/82, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48 p. 21, No. 7945/77, Dec. 4.7.78, D.R. 14 p. 228). - EKMR, 11.03.1982 - 9000/80
X. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1992 - 15435/89
It is therefore not for the Commission to decide whether or not domestic courts have correctly assessed evidence unless there is an indication that the judge has drawn grossly unfair or arbitrary conclusions from the facts before him (cf., inter alia, Eur. Court H.R., Kostovski judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 166, p. 19 para. 39; No. 9000/80, Dec. 11.3.82, D.R. 28 pp. 127, 134).