Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 26999/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,29231) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
R.W.-L. v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 26999/95
The Commission recalls that the admissibility of evidence is primarily governed by the rules of domestic law, and as a general rule it is for the national courts to assess the evidence before them, whereas it is for the Convention organs to ascertain whether the proceedings considered as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was submitted, were fair (Eur. Court HR, Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, para. 43). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10857/84
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 26999/95
1 (Art. 6-1) obliges the courts to give reason for their judgments, it cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every argument adduced (Eur. Court HR, Helle v. Finland judgment of 19 December 1997, para. 55, to be published in Reports 1997; No. 10938/84, Dec. 9.12.86, D.R. 50, p. 98 at p. 114; No. 10857/84, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48, p. 106 at p. 150). - EKMR, 09.12.1986 - 10938/84
KAUFMAN contre la BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 14.01.1998 - 26999/95
1 (Art. 6-1) obliges the courts to give reason for their judgments, it cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every argument adduced (Eur. Court HR, Helle v. Finland judgment of 19 December 1997, para. 55, to be published in Reports 1997; No. 10938/84, Dec. 9.12.86, D.R. 50, p. 98 at p. 114; No. 10857/84, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48, p. 106 at p. 150).