Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  C.G.P. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85

  KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 29835/96

  1 (Art. 6-1) (cf. Eur. Court HR, Kostovski v. the Netherlands judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 166, p. 19, para. 39.).
• EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 12547/86

  BENDENOUN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 29835/96

  However, the Commission considers that an accused may be expected to give specific reasons for his request (cf. Eur. Court HR, Bendenoun v. France judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 284, p. 22, para. 22) and that the domestic courts are entitled to examine the validity of these reasons.
• EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86

  ASCH v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 29835/96

  3 of Article 6 (Art. 6-3) are specific aspects of the right to a fair trial set forth in paragraph 1, the Commission will consider the complaint under the two provisions taken together (cf. Eur. Court HR, Asch v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 25).
• EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82

  BRICMONT v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 29835/96

  It is in principle within the discretionary power of domestic courts to establish whether the hearing of witnesses is likely to be of assistance for discovering the truth and, if not, to refuse the calling of such witnesses (cf. Eur. Court HR, Bricmont v. France judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89).
• EKMR, 15.10.1980 - 8403/78

  JESPERS v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 15.01.1997 - 29835/96

  3 (b) (Art. 6-3-b) of the Convention (cf. No. 8403/78, Jespers v. Belgium, Comm. Rep. 14.12.81, paras. 56 and 59, D.R. 27, pp. 87 and 88).

• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

  Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair

  The facilities which should be enjoyed by everyone charged with a criminal offence include the opportunity to acquaint himself, for the purposes of preparing his defence, with the results of investigations carried out throughout the proceedings (see C.G.P. v. the Netherlands, no. 29835/96, Commission decision of 15 January 1997, and Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, § 84, 15 November 2007).
• EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 1586/15

  ROOK v. GERMANY

  Zu den Möglichkeiten, die jede einer Straftat angeklagte Person haben sollte, gehört die Gelegenheit, sich zur Vorbereitung ihrer Verteidigung mit den Ergebnissen der während des Verfahrens durchgeführten Ermittlungen vertraut zu machen (siehe C.G.P../. Niederlande (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 29835/96, 15. Januar 1997, und Foucher./. Frankreich, 18. März 1997, Rdnrn. 31 bis 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II).
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 6293/04

  MIRILASHVILI v. RUSSIA

  Toutefois, il lui arrive d'examiner ce genre d'affaires sous l'angle de l'article 6 §§ 3 d) - lorsque sont en cause des témoins anonymes - ou b) - lorsqu'elles portent sur le défaut de communication de preuves favorables à la défense - (voir Jespers c. Belgique, no 8403/78, rapport de la Commission du 14 décembre 1981, Décisions et rapports 27, § 59 ; et C.G.P. c. Pays-Bas (déc.), no 29835/96, 15 janvier 1997).