Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 36428/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,29928) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KENNEDY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.05.1985 - 8658/79
Bönisch ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 36428/97
The Commission recalls that the guarantees contained in paragraph 3 of Article 6 are specific aspects of the general concept of a fair trial set forth in paragraph 1 (Eur. Court HR, Bönisch v. Austria judgment of 6 May 1985, Series A no. 92, pp. 14-15, para. 29).3 (d) distinguishes, from the point of view of the accused, between "witnesses against him" and "witnesses on his behalf", both of which are autonomous notions, and guarantees for the accused different rights in respect of each category of witnesses (Unterpertinger v. Austria, Comm. Report 12.3.84, paras. 89-92, Eur. Court HR, Series A no. 92, pp. 21-22).
- EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 36428/97
However, the Convention organs must ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see, inter alia, Eur. Court HR, Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, para. 33).