Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  B. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 14.11.2002 - 59879/00

  BERKMANN v. AUSTRIA

  Moreover, Article 6 does not apply to proceedings concerning a demolition order addressed to the owner of an adjacent parcel of land (see Krickl v. Austria, application no. 21752/93, Commission decision of 21 May 1997, D.R. 89, p. 5) and to proceedings for a building permit if such a permit is not allowed under the zoning plan in force (no. 10471/83, Dec. 9.12.85, D.R. 45 p. 113; no. 26085/95, Dec. 28.2.96 unreported; no. 26794/95, Dec. 4.9.96, unreported; Enzi v. Austria (Dec.), no. 29268/95, 8.2.2000, unreported).
• EKMR, 16.10.1995 - 16970/90

  ALLAN JACOBSSON v. SWEDEN

  to the permitted use of the land (see No. 10471/83, Dec.
• EGMR, 08.02.2000 - 29268/95

  ENZI v. AUSTRIA

  Moreover, Article 6 does not apply to proceedings for a building permit if such a permit is not allowed under the zoning plan in force (No. 10471/83, Dec. 9.12.85, D.R. 45 p. 113; No. 26085/95, Dec. 28.2.96 unpublished; No. 26794/95, Dec. 4.9.96, unpublished).

• EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 26794/95

  SCHERTLER v. AUSTRIA

  No. 10471/83, Dec.
• EKMR, 26.06.1996 - 26575/95

  SCHERTLER v. AUSTRIA

  10471/83, Dec.
• EKMR, 28.02.1996 - 26508/95

  MÄSER v. AUSTRIA

  10471/83, Dec.
• EKMR, 02.09.1994 - 20326/92

  GRANDER v. SWEDEN

  The Commission has also held that a dispute about an owner's use of land for purposes other than those listed in the relevant rules does not determine the owner's civil rights, but concerns the application of public law regulations to the permitted use of the land (see No. 10471/83, Dec. 9.12.85, D.R. 45 p. 113).