Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 12.10.1988 - 12164/86 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1988,9444) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AGNEESSENS v. BELGIUM
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AGNEESSENS contre la BELGIQUE
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
irrecevable (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (7)
- EKMR, 11.01.1995 - 18959/91
S.E. K. v. SWITZERLAND
The Commission recalls that domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention have been exhausted if, before the highest domestic body, the applicant has submitted in substance his complaint before the Commission, even without particular reference to the Convention (No. 7299/75 and 7496/76, Dec. 4.12.79, D.R. 18 p. 5; No. 12164/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 58 p. 63). - EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 22542/93
SATIR v. AUSTRIA
It recalls that domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention have only been exhausted if, before the highest domestic body, the applicant has submitted, at least in substance, his complaint he puts before the Commission, even without particular reference to the Convention (cf., e.g., No. 6861/75, Dec. 14.7.75, D.R. 3 p. 147; Nos. 5573/72 and 5670/72, Dec. 16.7.76, D.R. 7 p. 8; No. 7299/75 and 7496/76, Dec. 4.12.79, D.R. 18 p. 5; No. 12164/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 58 p. 63). - EKMR, 06.09.1995 - 21842/93
KEMPERS v. AUSTRIA
The Commission recalls that domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention have been exhausted if, before the highest domestic body, the applicant has submitted at least in substance the complaint he is raising before the Commission, even without particular reference to the Convention (No. 7299/75 and 7496/76, Dec. 4.12.79, D.R. 18 p. 5; No. 12164/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 58 p. 63).
- EKMR, 01.07.1994 - 18877/91
AHMET v. GREECE
On this point, the Commission refers to its constant case-law (see, for example, No. 12164/86, Dec. 12.10.88, Agneessens v. Belgium, D.R. 58 p. 63). - EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21132/93
PETERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Recalling that to exhaust domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention the person concerned must have raised before the national authorities, at least in substance, the complaint he puts before the Commission (cf. No. 12164/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 58 p. 63), the Commission finds that it is therefore not competent to deal with this aspect of the applicant's complaint. - EGMR, 29.08.2000 - 43601/98
DONAIRE HERNANDEZ et HERNANDEZ BARBERO contre l'ESPAGNE
Par ailleurs, pour avoir épuisé les voies de recours internes, l'intéressé doit avoir fait valoir, au moins en substance, devant les instances nationales le grief qu'il soumet à la Cour (cf., par exemple, n° 12164/86, déc. 12.10.88, D.R. 58, p. 63). - EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 30143/96
ESTATE OF EDUARD IV HAAS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
However, a person complaining of an interference with his or her right to property under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) must show that such a right existed (cf. No. 12164/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 58 p. 63).