Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 17295/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,10730) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NICOLAE AUGUSTIN RADULESCU v. ROMANIA
Art. 41 MRK
Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 17295/10
- EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 17295/10
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 17295/10
In particular, it reiterates that where the applicant has died after the application was lodged, the Court has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case, for instance: the widow and children in Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A, and Stojkovic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 14818/02, § 25, 8 November 2007; the parents in X v. France, no. 18020/91, § 26, 31 March 1992; the nephew and potential heir in Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII; or the unmarried or de facto partner in Velikova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 41488/98, 18 May 1999 (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014; and Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, § 29, 8 April 2014). - EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87
RAIMONDO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 17295/10
In particular, it reiterates that where the applicant has died after the application was lodged, the Court has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case, for instance: the widow and children in Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A, and Stojkovic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 14818/02, § 25, 8 November 2007; the parents in X v. France, no. 18020/91, § 26, 31 March 1992; the nephew and potential heir in Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII; or the unmarried or de facto partner in Velikova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 41488/98, 18 May 1999 (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014; and Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, § 29, 8 April 2014). - EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 14818/02
STOJKOVIC v.
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 17295/10
In particular, it reiterates that where the applicant has died after the application was lodged, the Court has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case, for instance: the widow and children in Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A, and Stojkovic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 14818/02, § 25, 8 November 2007; the parents in X v. France, no. 18020/91, § 26, 31 March 1992; the nephew and potential heir in Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII; or the unmarried or de facto partner in Velikova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 41488/98, 18 May 1999 (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014; and Ergezen v. Turkey, no. 73359/10, § 29, 8 April 2014).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 17295/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,1428) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NICOLAE AUGUSTIN RADULESCU v. ROMANIA
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Nicolae Augustin RÇŽdulescu v. Romania
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
NICOLAE AUGUSTIN RADULESCU v. ROMANIA
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 17295/10
- EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 17295/10
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 17295/10
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding conditions of detention (see, for instance, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; and Iacov Stanciu, cited above, §§ 165-170).