Their mere existence would not render the first applicant's removal contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (referring to I.I.N. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 2035/04, 9 December 2004).

{FN:33} - Entscheidungen des EGMR vom 22. Juni 2004, F gegen das Vereinigte Königreich (Beschw.-Nr. 17341/03, Randnr. 3) und vom 9. Dezember 2004, 1.I.N. gegen die Niederlande (Beschw.-Nr. 2035/04).

The respondent Government submitted that, in view of the Court findings in Jabari v. Turkey (no. 40035/98, § 39, ECHR 2000 VIII) and I.I.N. v. the Netherlands ((dec.), no. 2035/04, 9 December 2004), the fact that the AIVD believes the applicant to be a threat to national security necessitates an extremely thorough examination of whether the applicant has indeed made a plausible case that there are substantial grounds for concluding that he would be at risk of treatment in violation of Article 3 of the Convention in case of his expulsion to Libya.