Wird zitiert von ... (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.05.2021 - 4907/18

  XERO FLOR w POLSCE sp. z o. o. - Unabhängigkeit der polnischen Gerichte

  It is also necessary to underline that important legal issues concerning the election of constitutional judges in 2015 were addressed in several separate opinions of the judges of Constitutional Court, in particular in: the separate opinion of judge Pyziak-Szafnicka, appended to the judgment 23 February 2017, K 2/15; the separate opinions of Judge Kieres, Judge Pyziak-Szafnicka and Judge Wronkowska-Jaśkiewicz, appended to the judgment of 16 March 2017, Kp. 1/17; the separate opinion of judge Rymar appended to the judgment of 4 April 2017, P 56/14; the separate opinion of Judge Wronkowska-Jaśkiewicz, appended to the the judgment of 20 April 2017, K 10/15; the separate opinions of judge Tuleja and of Judge Wronkowska-Jaśkiewicz, appended to the decision of 20 April 2017, K 23/15; and the separate opinion of judge Kieres, appended to the judgment of 24 October 2017, K 1/17.

  The issue of composition of the Constitutional Court's bench after 2015, from the viewpoint of domestic law, has been further addressed in several separate opinions of Constitutional Court's judges, in particular in: the separate opinion of Judge Wronkowska-Jaśkiewicz, appended to the judgment of 16 March 2017, Kp. 1/17; the separate opinion of judge Rymar appended to the judgment of 4 April 2017, P 56/14; the separate opinion of Judge Wronkowska-Jaśkiewicz, appended to the the judgment of 20 April 2017, K 10/15; the separate opinions of judge Tuleja and of Judge Wronkowska-Jaśkiewicz, appended to the decision of 20 April 2017, K 23/15; the separate opinion of judge Kieres, appended to the judgment of 24 October 2017, K 1/17.

• LG Aachen, 09.10.2019 - 65 KLs 16/19
  A 23/15 (Beschluss vom 30.06.2016) berücksichtigt, die unter anderem die mangelhaften Haftbedingungen in F (geringe Zellengröße, Überbelegung, mangelnde Sauberkeit) zum Gegenstand hatten, sowie auch, dass der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte F in der jüngeren Vergangenheit mit mehreren Urteilen wegen der Überfüllung seiner Gefängnisse verurteilt hat (EGMR, Vociu/F, Nr. #####/##, Bujorean/F, Nr. #####/##, Constantin Aurelian Burlacu/F, Nr. #####/##, und Mihai Laurenţiu Marin/F, Nr. #####/##) und aufgrund der Haftbedingungen Verstöße gegen Art. 3 EMRK (Folter/unmenschliche/erniedrigende Behandlung) bejahte.