Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VINOGRADOV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 78774/13

  TOPEKHIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 27122/10

  The relevant provisions of domestic and international law on the detention of disabled inmates are cited in Topekhin v. Russia (no. 78774/13, §§ 52-45 and §§ 54-58, 10 May 2016).
• EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 40512/13

  ANTONOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 27122/10

  The Court reiterates that it is not its task to rule on matters lying exclusively within the field of expertise of medical specialists and to establish whether an applicant in fact required a particular treatment (see Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 76, 18 December 2008, and Sergey Antonov v. Ukraine, no. 40512/13, § 86, 22 October 2015).
• EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 6087/03

  GRIMAILOVS v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 27122/10

  The Court reiterates that it has previously found violations of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of professional nursing assistance available to partially paralysed prisoners (see Topekhin, cited above, §§ 85-88; Semikhvostov v. Russia, no. 2689/12, §§ 85-86, 6 February 2014; Grimailovs v. Latvia, no. 6087/03, §§ 161-62, 25 June 2013; D.G. v. Poland, no. 45705/07, § 177, 12 February 2013; and Kaprykowski v. Poland, no. 23052/05, § 74, 3 February 2009).

• EGMR, 06.02.2014 - 2689/12

  SEMIKHVOSTOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 27122/10

  The Court reiterates that it has previously found violations of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of professional nursing assistance available to partially paralysed prisoners (see Topekhin, cited above, §§ 85-88; Semikhvostov v. Russia, no. 2689/12, §§ 85-86, 6 February 2014; Grimailovs v. Latvia, no. 6087/03, §§ 161-62, 25 June 2013; D.G. v. Poland, no. 45705/07, § 177, 12 February 2013; and Kaprykowski v. Poland, no. 23052/05, § 74, 3 February 2009).
• EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 45705/07

  D.G. v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 27122/10

  The Court reiterates that it has previously found violations of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of professional nursing assistance available to partially paralysed prisoners (see Topekhin, cited above, §§ 85-88; Semikhvostov v. Russia, no. 2689/12, §§ 85-86, 6 February 2014; Grimailovs v. Latvia, no. 6087/03, §§ 161-62, 25 June 2013; D.G. v. Poland, no. 45705/07, § 177, 12 February 2013; and Kaprykowski v. Poland, no. 23052/05, § 74, 3 February 2009).
• EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 591/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 27122/10

  In the light of the above, and taking into account that the applicant did not submit any medical opinions suggesting any shortcomings in his treatment, the Court cannot find that he was deprived of adequate medical care (see Yepishin v. Russia, no. 591/07, §§ 52-54, 27 June 2013).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 12.12.2018 - 1439/06

  A.B. CONTRE LA RUSSIE ET 135 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  27122/10.
• EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 1647/16

  KHUSEYNOV v. RUSSIA

  The applicant explained that he had no confidence in the doctors, but the Court cannot accept this argument, as it sees no shortcomings on the part of the medical authorities which could justify such a lack of trust in the healthcare providers (see, mutatis mutandis, Vinogradov v. Russia, no. 27122/10, § 35, 7 March 2017; contrast Makshakov v. Russia, no. 52526/07, § 100, 24 May 2016).