Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11, 37602/11, 43776/11 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ABDALOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 37) Striking out applications-general;Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election);Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ABDALOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)
[DEU] Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 37) Striking out applications-general;Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election);Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ABDALOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Zitiert selbst (14)
- EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 18705/06
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
A more detailed summary of the system of electoral commissions, their composition and decision-making procedures, as well as the procedure for examination of election-related appeals, is provided in Namat Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 18705/06, §§ 31-44, 8 April 2010).The Court has to satisfy itself that the conditions in which the applicants' individual electoral rights were exercised did not curtail the rights in question to such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness (see Namat Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 18705/06, § 75, 8 April 2010; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 3) [GC], no. 126/05, § 84, 22 May 2012; and Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.
- EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11
ANNAGI HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 21-28, 22 October 2015).Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declaration, the Court considers - for the reasons stated in Tahirov v. Azerbaijan (no. 31953/11, §§ 32-42, 11 June 2015) and Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 30-40, 22 October 2015), which are equally applicable to the present case and from which the Court sees no reason to deviate - that the proposed declaration does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the present application.
- EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 48555/10
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
48555/10 and 48377/10, § 142, 13 October 2015).
- EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 14737/08
USPASKICH v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
The Court reiterates that the applicants were entitled, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, to stand for election in fair and democratic conditions, regardless of whether ultimately they won or lost (see Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no. 14737/08, §§ 88-92, 20 December 2016, § 88, with further references). - EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 2326/11
MAMMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
2326/11 and 3 others, 30 June 2016). - EGMR, 16.06.2016 - 30362/11
SOLTANOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
Similar findings were made in a number of other cases (see Gasimli and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 25330/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Vugar Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 24853/11 and 3 others, 17 December 2015; Bagirov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 17356/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Soltanov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 30362/11 and 4 others, 16 June 2016; Gaya Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. - EGMR, 16.06.2016 - 29781/11
GAYA ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
29781/11 and 5 others, 16 June 2016; and Mammadli and Others [Committee], nos. - EGMR, 17.12.2015 - 17356/11
BAGIROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
Similar findings were made in a number of other cases (see Gasimli and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 25330/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Vugar Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 24853/11 and 3 others, 17 December 2015; Bagirov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 17356/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Soltanov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 30362/11 and 4 others, 16 June 2016; Gaya Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. - EGMR, 17.12.2015 - 25330/11
GASIMLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
Similar findings were made in a number of other cases (see Gasimli and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 25330/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Vugar Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 24853/11 and 3 others, 17 December 2015; Bagirov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 17356/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Soltanov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 30362/11 and 4 others, 16 June 2016; Gaya Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. - EGMR, 17.12.2015 - 24853/11
VUGAR ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11
Similar findings were made in a number of other cases (see Gasimli and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 25330/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Vugar Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 24853/11 and 3 others, 17 December 2015; Bagirov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 17356/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Soltanov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 30362/11 and 4 others, 16 June 2016; Gaya Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. - EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14
INTIGAM ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 28881/07
[FRE]
- EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 29400/05
[ENG]
- EGMR, 11.06.2015 - 31953/11
TAHIROV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 10.07.2020 - 310/15
Mugemangango v. Belgium
Lorsque le droit national confiait l'examen des litiges postélectoraux à une instance juridictionnelle, la Cour a examiné l'affaire uniquement sous l'angle de l'article 3 du Protocole no 1, considérant qu'il n'était pas nécessaire d'examiner séparément l'article 13 de la Convention (voir, par exemple, Podkolzina, précité, § 45, Kerimova, précité, §§ 31-32, Gahramanli et autres, précité, § 56, Davydov et autres, précité, § 200, et Abdalov et autres c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 28508/11 et 33773/18, § 108, 11 juillet 2019) ou qu'aucune question distincte ne se posait sous l'angle de cette disposition (Riza et autres, précité, § 95). - EGMR, 22.07.2025 - 15653/22
BRADSHAW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Consequently, the Court has to satisfy itself that the conditions in which applicants' individual electoral rights were exercised did not curtail the rights in question to such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness (see Abdalov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 28508/11 and 33773/18, § 91, 11 July 2019; Namat Aliyev, see above, § 75; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 3) [GC], no. 126/05, § 84, 22 May 2012; and Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".