Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  INTIGAM ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 18 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  This is all the more so since the Statute of the Council of Europe, an organisation of which each of the States Parties to the Convention is a Member, refers in two places to the rule of law: first in the Preamble, where the signatory Governments affirm their devotion to this principle, and secondly in Article 3 which provides that "every Member of the Council of Europe must accept the principle of the rule of law..." (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 34, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10

  SAVRIDDIN DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  As regards the individual measures to be taken in response to the Court's judgment, their primary aim is to achieve restitutio in integrum, that is, to put an end to the breach of the Convention and make reparation for its consequences in such a way as to restore as far as possible the situation existing before the breach (see, among other authorities, Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, § 248, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  According to the Court's case-law, the search of a lawyer's office, including documents and electronic data, amounts to an interference with his "private life", "home" and "correspondence" (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, §§ 29-33, Series A no. 251-B; Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, §§ 70-72, 27 September 2005; and Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 212, 22 December 2008).

 
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  However, with a view to assisting the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see, for example, Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, cited above, § 237, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 159, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 27.08.2015 - 46470/11

  PARRILLO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  For it to be compatible with the Convention, a limitation of this right must, in particular, pursue an aim that can be linked to one of those listed in this provision (see Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470/11, § 163, ECHR 2015).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  Subject to monitoring by the Committee of Ministers, the respondent State remains free to choose the means by which it will discharge its legal obligation under Article 46, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions and the spirit of the Court's judgment (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192, ECHR 2004-V; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, §§ 89-98, ECHR 2005-X; Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 70-71, ECHR 2006-XIV; Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065/05, §§ 235-43, 2 December 2010; Emre v. Switzerland (no. 2), no. 5056/10, §§ 67-68, 11 October 2011; and McCaughey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 43098/09, § 142, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 37083/03

  TEBIETI MÜHAFIZE CEMIYYETI AND ISRAFILOV c. AZERBAIDJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  The Court reiterates that the way in which national legislation enshrines the freedom of association and its practical application by the authorities reveal the state of democracy in the country concerned (see Tebieti Mühafize Cemiyyeti and Israfilov v. Azerbaijan, no. 37083/03, § 52, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 5056/10

  Emre ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  Subject to monitoring by the Committee of Ministers, the respondent State remains free to choose the means by which it will discharge its legal obligation under Article 46, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions and the spirit of the Court's judgment (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192, ECHR 2004-V; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, §§ 89-98, ECHR 2005-X; Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 70-71, ECHR 2006-XIV; Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065/05, §§ 235-43, 2 December 2010; Emre v. Switzerland (no. 2), no. 5056/10, §§ 67-68, 11 October 2011; and McCaughey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 43098/09, § 142, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 43098/09

  McCAUGHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  Subject to monitoring by the Committee of Ministers, the respondent State remains free to choose the means by which it will discharge its legal obligation under Article 46, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions and the spirit of the Court's judgment (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192, ECHR 2004-V; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, §§ 89-98, ECHR 2005-X; Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 70-71, ECHR 2006-XIV; Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065/05, §§ 235-43, 2 December 2010; Emre v. Switzerland (no. 2), no. 5056/10, §§ 67-68, 11 October 2011; and McCaughey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 43098/09, § 142, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 27065/05

  ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  Subject to monitoring by the Committee of Ministers, the respondent State remains free to choose the means by which it will discharge its legal obligation under Article 46, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions and the spirit of the Court's judgment (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192, ECHR 2004-V; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, §§ 89-98, ECHR 2005-X; Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 70-71, ECHR 2006-XIV; Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065/05, §§ 235-43, 2 December 2010; Emre v. Switzerland (no. 2), no. 5056/10, §§ 67-68, 11 October 2011; and McCaughey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 43098/09, § 142, ECHR 2013).

• EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 17184/18

  A AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  68762/14 and 71200/14, § 114-40, 20 September 2018, concerning Article 3 (conditions of detention); Mammadov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 35432/07, §§ 102-29, 21 February 2019, concerning Article 3; Aghdgomelashvili and Japaridze v. Georgia, no. 7224/11, §§ 30-50, 8 October 2020, concerning Articles 3 and 14; Dzerkorashvili and Others v. Georgia, no. 70572/16, §§ 56-105 and 125-26, 2 March 2023, concerning Articles 3, 5, 8, 13 and 14; and Lapunov v. Russia, no. 28834/19, §§ 77-121, 12 September 2023, concerning Articles 3 and 14).
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21

  M.L. v. POLAND

  This is all the more so since the Statute of the Council of Europe refers to the rule of law in two places: firstly in the Preamble, where the signatory Governments affirm their devotion to this principle, and secondly in Article 3, which provides that "every Member of the Council of Europe must accept the principle of the rule of law..." (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 34, Series A no. 18, and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, § 225, 20 September 2018).
• EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 35614/19

  ILERDE AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE

  68762/14 and 71200/14, §§ 131-134, 20 September 2018).

 
• EGMR, 31.05.2022 - 73548/17

  X AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Subject to monitoring by the Committee of Ministers, the respondent State remains free to choose the means by which it will discharge its legal obligation under Article 46, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions and the spirit of the Court's judgment (see Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, § 221, 20 September 2018, with further references).
• EGMR, 31.05.2022 - 208/18

  U-Haft für türkischen Amnesty-Chef war rechtswidrig

  Les textes du Conseil de l'Europe et autres instruments internationaux pertinents relatifs à la protection et au rôle des défenseurs des droits de l'homme sont exposés dans l'arrêt Aliyev c. Azerbaïdjan (nos 68762/14 et 71200/14, §§ 88-92, 20 septembre 2018).
• EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 32734/11

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)

  Those criminal proceedings were the subject of a separate application lodged by him with the Court (see Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, 20 September 2018).