Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CUMBER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 5 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

  ARTICO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28779/95

  However, the Convention is "intended to guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective" (Eur. Court HR, the Artico v. Italy judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 16, para. 33).
• EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77

  COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28779/95

  The Commission refers, on this point, to its constant case-law (see eg. No. 458/59, X v. Belgium, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222, 236; No. 5258/71, X v. Sweden, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77; No. 7987/77, X v. Austria, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45; No. 19890/92, Ziegler v. Switzerland, Dec. 3.5.93, D.R. 74 p. 234).
• EKMR, 08.02.1973 - 5258/71

  X. v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28779/95

  The Commission refers, on this point, to its constant case-law (see eg. No. 458/59, X v. Belgium, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222, 236; No. 5258/71, X v. Sweden, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77; No. 7987/77, X v. Austria, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45; No. 19890/92, Ziegler v. Switzerland, Dec. 3.5.93, D.R. 74 p. 234).
• EKMR, 03.05.1993 - 19890/92

  ZIEGLER v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28779/95

  The Commission refers, on this point, to its constant case-law (see eg. No. 458/59, X v. Belgium, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222, 236; No. 5258/71, X v. Sweden, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77; No. 7987/77, X v. Austria, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45; No. 19890/92, Ziegler v. Switzerland, Dec. 3.5.93, D.R. 74 p. 234).
• EKMR, 05.07.1976 - 6821/74

  HUBER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28779/95

  Such a finding of a contravention may be made by the domestic authorities or by the Convention organs (No. 6821/74, Huber v. Austria, Dec. 5.7.76, D.R. 6 p. 69).

• EGMR, 25.01.2022 - 27684/17

  Türkei muss Deniz Yücel für Untersuchungshaft entschädigen

  À cet égard, elle rappelle que l'article 5 § 5 ne confère pas un droit à une indemnisation d'un montant particulier, pourvu que celle-ci ne soit pas dérisoire ou entièrement disproportionnée (Attard c. Malte (déc.), no 46750/99, 28 septembre 2000, et Cumber c. Royaume-Uni, no 28779/95, décision de la Commission européenne des Droits de l'Homme du 27 novembre 1996), ou considérablement inférieure à ce que la Cour accorde dans des cas similaires de violation (Ganea c. Moldova, no 2474/06, § 30, 17 mai 2011, et Cristina Boicenco c. Moldova, no 25688/09, § 43, 27 septembre 2011).
• EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 33544/08

  PERDEDA v. ALBANIA

  Having regard to the amount awarded to the applicant for his illegal imprisonment, can he still claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 5 of the Convention? If so, do the facts of the case, in particular the amount of compensation awarded to the applicant, disclose a violation of Article 5 § 5 of the Convention (see Ganea v. Moldova, no. 2474/06, §§ 25-31, 17 May 2011; Attard v. Malta (dec.), no. 46750/99, 28 September 2000; and Cumber v. the United Kingdom, no. 28779/95, Commission decision of 27 November 1996)?.
• EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 39783/15

  BORG v. MALTA

  Noting that the provision does not refer to specific amounts (see Cumber v. The United Kingdom, no. 28779/95, Commission Decision of 27 November 1996), the Court considers that, in principle, an award of EUR 150 for a three-day detention would not be entirely disproportionate (see by contrast, Ganea v. Moldova, no. 2474/06, § 30, 17 May 2011, where EUR 63 was considered too little for a three-day detention; see also Attard v. Malta (dec.), no. 46750/99, 28 September 2000, where the equivalent of EUR 230 - without an order for costs - was found proportionate in respect of detention of some hours).