Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 31271/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHATUNOV AND SHATUNOVA v. RUSSIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 3 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 31271/02
- EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 31271/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 31271/02
Therefore, in the present case the Court is not called upon to decide whether the applicant's detention was lawful in terms of Article 5 § 1 (c), since the award of damages in any event constituted an acknowledgement of the alleged violation and adequate redress (see, by contrast, Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI). - EGMR, 04.10.2001 - 47636/99
TEUSCHLER contre l'ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 31271/02
As regards the allegation that the first applicant did not receive a copy of the ruling on termination of the proceedings in due time and that he could not therefore appeal against it, the Court recalls that it is incumbent on the interested party to display special diligence in the defence of his interests (see Teuschler v. Germany (dec.), no. 47636/99, 4 October 2001). - EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 59017/00
SOARES FERNANDES c. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 31271/02
The Court recalls that, according to its case-law, proceedings terminate on the date of the final judgment or, where later, when the written judgment is served upon the applicant (see Soares Fernandes v. Portugal, no. 59017/00, § 17, 8 April 2004).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 31271/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHATUNOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - State to secure enforcement of judgment debt Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 31271/02
- EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 31271/02
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 25964/02
POZNAKHIRINA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 31271/02
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to those in the present case (see, among other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III and Poznakhirina v. Russia, no. 25964/02, 24 February 2005).
- EGMR, 09.02.2006 - 3504/02
BOGDANOV v. RUSSIA
For relevant provisions of Russian law on enforcement of court judgments against budget-funded organisations see Wasserma v. Russia (dec., no. 15021/02, 25 March 2004), and Shatunov and Shatunova v. Russia (dec., no. 31271/02, 30 June 2005). - EGMR, 23.08.2011 - 15884/04
KOMARCHENKO v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates in this respect that it is incumbent on the interested party to display special diligence in the defence of his interests (see Shatunov and Shatunova v. Russia (dec.), no. 31271/02, 30 June 2005).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".