Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AL ALO v. SLOVAKIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  AL ALO v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. e MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 55287/10

  SETON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 32084/19

  These principles may be summarised as follows (see Seton v. the United Kingdom, no. 55287/10, § 58, 31 March 2016):.
• EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 16980/06

  PALCHIK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 32084/19

  Furthermore, the Court has held that the ability to confront a witness for the prosecution at the investigation stage is an important procedural safeguard which can compensate for the handicaps faced by the defence on account of absence of such a witness from the trial (see Palchik v. Ukraine, no. 16980/06, § 50, 2 March 2017,with further references).
• EGMR - 29384/12 (anhängig)

  CIERNY v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 32084/19

  In so far as a waiver of an important Article 6 right is implicit, it must be shown that the applicant could reasonably have foreseen the consequences of his or her conduct (see Zachar and Cierny v. Slovakia, nos. 29376/12 and 29384/12, §§ 60 and 68, 21 July 2015, with further references).
• EuGH - C-197/01

  Nichtigerklärung der Verordnung Nr. 396/2001 der Kommission vom 27. Februar 2001 …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 32084/19

  EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS 28. On 29 May 2000 the Council of the European Union adopted the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (2000/C 197/01).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EuGH, 08.12.2022 - C-348/21

  HYA u.a. (Impossibilité d'interroger les témoins à charge) - Vorlage zur …

  Was den letztgenannten Aspekt betrifft, kann eine Verfahrensgarantie, die geeignet ist, die Schwierigkeiten auszugleichen, die der Verteidigung durch die Abwesenheit des Zeugen in der gerichtlichen Phase des Strafverfahrens entstehen, darin bestehen, dass dieser Person oder ihrem Rechtsbeistand Gelegenheit gegeben wurde, einen Zeugen in der Ermittlungsphase dieses Verfahrens zu befragen (vgl. in diesem Sinne EGMR, Urteil vom 10. Februar 2022, Al Alo/Slowakei, CE:ECHR:2022:0210JUD003208419, § 56 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).
• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 43627/16

  OKROPIRIDZE v. GEORGIA and 1 other application

  However, it has repeatedly noted that departure abroad does not in itself constitute sufficient reason to justify the absence of the witness concerned from the trial (see Seton, cited above, § 61; see also Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088/05, § 78, 10 April 2012, and Al Alo v. Slovakia, no. 32084/19, §§ 48-52, 10 February 2022).
• EGMR, 29.04.2025 - 23369/16

  JAUPI v. ALBANIA

  The Court has repeatedly stated that departure abroad does not in itself constitute sufficient reason for the absence of a witness from the trial (see Paić, cited above, § 38; Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088/05, § 78, 10 April 2012; and Al Alo v. Slovakia, no. 32084/19, §§ 48-52, 10 February 2022).

• EGMR, 29.08.2024 - 59464/21

  KHACHAPURIDZE AND KHACHIDZE v. GEORGIA and 1 other application

  As regards the three non-Georgian witnesses living abroad, the Court reiterates that departure abroad does not in itself constitute a sufficient reason to justify the absence of the witness concerned from the trial (see Seton, cited above, § 61; Paić v. Croatia, no. 47082/12, § 38, 29 March 2016; and Al Alo v. Slovakia, no. 32084/19, §§ 48-52, 10 February 2022).
• EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 46472/19

  ÖZTiRAK c. TURQUIE

  Accordingly, and bearing in mind that the admissibility of evidence is a matter for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Al Alo v. Slovakia, no. 32084/19, § 42, 10 February 2022, with further references), the Court emphasises that the appeal at issue and the review to be conducted by the Court of Cassation are of particular relevance for both of the complaints raised by the applicant in the present case.
• EGMR, 29.06.2023 - 26134/19

  KHAVSHABOVA v. GEORGIA

  As repeatedly noted, departure abroad does not in itself constitute sufficient reason to justify the absence of the witness concerned from the trial (see Seton v. the United Kingdom, no. 55287/10, § 61, 31 March 2016; see also Gabrielyan, cited above, § 81; Paić v. Croatia, no. 47082/12, § 38, 29 March 2016; and Al Alo v. Slovakia, no. 32084/19, §§ 48-52, 10 February 2022).
• EGMR, 09.03.2023 - 54292/18

  LIPARTIA AND BERDZENISHVILI v. GEORGIA

  However, it is the responsibility of the relevant authorities to make a reasonable effort to secure the presence of the prosecution witnesses (see Süleyman v. Turkey, no. 59453/10, § 77, 17 November 2020, and Al Alo v. Slovakia, no. 32084/19, §§ 48-54, 10 February 2022; see also Paić, cited above, § 38).
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 5692/13

  CSÁSZY AND TÁTRAI v. HUNGARY

  Among other things, the waiver must be attended by minimum safeguards commensurate with the waiver's importance (see Al Alo v. Slovakia, no. 32084/19, § 59, 10 February 2022).