Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KREYNDLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KREYNDLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 1, Art. 11, Art. 14Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 33470/18

  It accordingly considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of these complaints (see, mutatis mutandis, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00

  BLECIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 33470/18

  Since the scope of the Court's jurisdiction is determined by the Convention itself, in particular by Article 32, and not by the parties' submissions in a particular case, the mere absence of a plea cannot extend that jurisdiction (see Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 III).
• EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 33470/18

  It will examine the matter in the light of the general principles concerning compliance with Article 38 of the Convention, as they have been summarised in Janowiec and Others v. Russia ([GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, §§ 202-04, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 03.07.2014 - 18114/06

  AMADAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 33470/18

  Having regard to its findings in paragraphs 56-60 above, and given, in particular, that the issue of the alleged failure to identify the participants of the episode of 8 September 2016 partially overlaps with the complaint about ineffective investigation into the subsequent attack on the applicants, the Court does not find it necessary to decide whether prior to the incident the authorities ought to have been aware of the real and imminent danger to the applicants (see Amadayev v. Russia, no. 18114/06, § 84, 3 July 2014).
• EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 40165/07

  ADZHIGITOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 33470/18

  It reiterates that the Government are obliged, as a party to the proceedings, to comply with the Court's requests to produce evidence (see Adzhigitova and Others v. Russia, nos. 40165/07 and 2593/08, § 157, 22 June 2021).

• EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 81249/17

  ALLOUCHE c. FRANCE

  La Cour rappelle également que les incidents violents à motivation supposément discriminatoire, en particulier raciste, ne doivent pas être traités sur un pied d'égalité avec des délits ne comportant pas de tels motifs (Skorjanec, précité, § 53, et, plus récemment, Kreyndlin et autres c. Russie, no 33470/18, § 58, 31 janvier 2023 ; voir également paragraphe 29 ci-dessus, renvoyant aux instruments internationaux adoptés en matière de la lutte contre les actes racistes).
• EGMR, 29.08.2023 - 25276/15

  VERZILOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Whether or not physical injuries of a certain gravity were sustained is not decisive for the assessment of the severity threshold (see Women's Initiatives Supporting Group and Others v. Georgia, nos. 73204/13 and 74959/13, § 60, 16 December 2021; see also Gremina v. Russia, no. 17054/08, §§ 21 and 89-91, 26 May 2020, and Kreyndlin and Others v. Russia, no. 33470/18, §§ 53-54, 31 January 2023).