Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11, 20443/11, 24070/11, 29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11, 36230/11, 37554/11, 39042/11 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ASLAN ISMAYILOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ASLAN ISMAYILOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (11)
- EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 36503/11
GAHRAMANLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN and 5 other applications
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11
The case originated in twelve applications (nos. 20411/11, 20443/11, 24070/11, 29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11, 36230/11, 37554/11 and 39042/11) against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by twelve Azerbaijani nationals, Mr Aslan Ziyaddin oglu Ismayilov, Mr Tofig Rashid oglu Yagublu, Mr Sardar Jalal oglu Mammadov, Mr Bakhtiyar Ilyas oglu Hajiyev, Mr Ilgar Gasham oglu Huseynli, Mr Nariman Yaman oglu Yahyayev, Ms Gozel Oruj qizi Bayramli, Mr Namat Faiz oglu Aliyev, Mr Salman Mahammad oglu Imanli, Mr Sahib Farman oglu Karimli, Mr Ilham Gasham oglu Huseynli and Mr Ikram Israyil oglu Israfil ("the applicants"), on various dates in 2011.29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11, 36230/11 and 37554/11) and Mr R. Mustafayev (application no. 39042/11), lawyers practising in Azerbaijan.
On 30 August 2013 (application no. 20411/11), 15 October 2013 (applications nos. 20443/11, 24070/11, 29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11 and 36230/11), 18 November 2013 (application no. 37554/11) and 9 December 2013 (application no. 39042/11) the applications were communicated to the Government.
The circumstances of the case are similar to those in Gahramanli and Others v. Azerbaijan (no. 36503/11, §§ 6-32, 8 October 2015).
The applicants who lodged a complaint with the relevant ConEC did not receive any reply from those bodies (except in applications nos. 37554/11 and 39042/11).
- Mr Ikram Israfil (application no. 39042/11) made no claim in respect of pecuniary damage.
- Mr Ikram Israfil (application no. 39042/11) claimed EUR 10, 000.
- Mr Ikram Israfil (application no. 39042/11) claimed EUR 3, 000 for legal expenses incurred in the domestic proceedings and before the Court.
- EUR 1, 000 to Mr Ikram Israfil (application no. 39042/11).
(iv) EUR 1, 000 (one thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, to the applicant in application no. 39042/11, in respect of costs and expenses, to be paid directly into his representative's bank account;.
39042/11.
- EGMR - 20443/11 (anhängig)
YAGUBLU v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11
The case originated in twelve applications (nos. 20411/11, 20443/11, 24070/11, 29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11, 36230/11, 37554/11 and 39042/11) against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by twelve Azerbaijani nationals, Mr Aslan Ziyaddin oglu Ismayilov, Mr Tofig Rashid oglu Yagublu, Mr Sardar Jalal oglu Mammadov, Mr Bakhtiyar Ilyas oglu Hajiyev, Mr Ilgar Gasham oglu Huseynli, Mr Nariman Yaman oglu Yahyayev, Ms Gozel Oruj qizi Bayramli, Mr Namat Faiz oglu Aliyev, Mr Salman Mahammad oglu Imanli, Mr Sahib Farman oglu Karimli, Mr Ilham Gasham oglu Huseynli and Mr Ikram Israyil oglu Israfil ("the applicants"), on various dates in 2011.The applicants were represented by Mr A. Alizade (applications nos. 20411/11 and 20443/11), Mr F. Agayev (application no. 24070/11), Mr H. Hasanov (applications nos.
On 30 August 2013 (application no. 20411/11), 15 October 2013 (applications nos. 20443/11, 24070/11, 29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11 and 36230/11), 18 November 2013 (application no. 37554/11) and 9 December 2013 (application no. 39042/11) the applications were communicated to the Government.
20443/11, 29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11, 36230/11 AND 37554/11 TO BE STRUCK OUT UNDER ARTICLE 37 OF THE CONVENTION.
- Mr Tofig Yagublu (application no. 20443/11) claimed AZN 104, 500 (approximately EUR 96, 760 at the time of submission of the claim (27 March 2014)) in respect of loss of the earnings he would have received in the form of a parliamentary member's salary if elected to the National Assembly, as well as loss of the money spent on his election campaign;.
- Mr Tofig Yagublu (application no. 20443/11) claimed AZN 30, 000 (approximately EUR 27, 780 at the time of submission of the claim);.
- Mr Tofig Yagublu (application no. 20443/11) claimed AZN 2, 500 (approximately EUR 2, 315 at the time of submission of the claim) for legal fees incurred before the Court and EUR 500 (approximately EUR 460) for translation expenses;.
- EUR 2, 000 jointly to Mr Aslan Ismayilov and Mr Tofig Yagublu (applications nos. 20411/11 and 20443/11);.
20443/11, 29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11, 36230/11 and 37554/11 out of the Court's list of cases;.
20411/11 and 20443/11 jointly, in respect of costs and expenses, to be paid directly into their representative's bank account;.
20443/11.
- KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11
Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11
CEC decision of 21/11/2010.CEC decision of 21/11/2010.
CEC decision of 21/11/2010.
CEC decision of 21/11/2010.
CEC decision of 21/11/2010.
CEC decision of 21/11/2010.
- BGH, 22.12.2011 - AK 22/11
Fortdauer der Untersuchungshaft über sechs Monate hinaus (dringender Tatverdacht; …
- EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 19/05
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11
19/05/2011.19/05/2011.
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 19/11
LANG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND HASTIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11
CEC decision of 19/11/2010.CEC decision of 19/11/2010.
- EGMR, 19.11.2015 - 17694/10
MAIO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11
Baku Court of Appeal judgment of 26/11/2010; Supreme Court decision of 02/12/2010. - RG, 18.05.1905 - 20/05
Ist fahrlässige Übertretung der Vorschrift des § 368 Nr. 10 St.G.B.'s strafbar?
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11
20/05/2011. - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 4641/06
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11
It is therefore impossible for the Court to speculate as to whether the applicants would have received a member of parliament's salary (see Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 4641/06, § 68, 10 January 2012). - EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 2204/11
ANNAGI HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.04.2017 - 20411/11
Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declarations, the Court considers - for the reasons stated in Tahirov v. Azerbaijan (no. 31953/11, §§ 32-42, 11 June 2015) and Annagi Hajibeyli v. Azerbaijan (no. 2204/11, §§ 30-40, 22 October 2015), which are equally applicable to the present cases and from which the Court sees no reason to deviate - that the proposed declarations do not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the present applications. - EGMR, 11.06.2015 - 31953/11
TAHIROV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 20443/11 (anhängig)
YAGUBLU v. AZERBAIJAN
The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, are similar to those of the case of Aslan Ismayilov v. Azerbaijan (no. 20411/11, communicated on 30 August 2013).The applicants' participation in the examination of their complaints by the commissions was not ensured (except in applications nos. 36209/11 and 36230/11, where the applicants participated in the relevant CEC hearing).
29615/11, 31944/11 and 36821/11, the Supreme Court also noted in its respective decisions that, on 29 November 2010, the Constitutional Court had reviewed and approved the election results.
29604/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11 and 36230/11 complain under Articles 13 and 14 of the Convention, in conjunction with the complaint under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, that, owing to the current method of composition of electoral commissions at all levels, the electoral commissions were not independent and impartial and, as a result, all their decisions heavily favoured the pro-Government candidates.
20443/11, 24070/11, 29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11, 36230/11 also complain under Article 14 of the Convention, in conjunction with the above complaints, that candidates nominated by opposition parties and independent candidates critical of the Government, like themselves, were discriminated against, by various means, by all State executive authorities, electoral commissions, courts and Government-controlled media throughout the entire electoral process.
29604/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11 and 36230/11: What were the rules of composition of electoral commissions for the parliamentary elections of 7 November 2010? Were they compatible with the principles enshrined in Article 3 of Protocol No. 1? Did the method of composition of electoral commissions affect the applicants' rights under Articles 13 and 14 of the Convention?.
20443/11, 24070/11, 29604/11, 29615/11, 31944/11, 36070/11, 36209/11, 36227/11, 36230/11: Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights on the ground of his political affiliation, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1?.
24070/11.
29604/11.
29615/11.
31944/11.
36070/11.
36209/11.
36227/11.
36230/11.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".