Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  N. AND M. v. RUSSIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 39496/14

  Secondly, the present case was similar to the cases of Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania ([GC], no. 47848/08, ECHR 2014) and Association for the Defence of Human Rights in Romania - Helsinki Committee on behalf of Ionel Garcea v. Romania (no. 2959/11, 24 March 2015), in which the Court held that in exceptional circumstances and in cases involving allegations of a serious nature it should be open to associations to represent victims in the absence of a power of attorney, and notwithstanding that the victim may have died before the application was lodged with the Court.
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 48609/06

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 39496/14

  According to the Court's established case-law, the concept of "victim" must be interpreted autonomously, and irrespective of domestic concepts such as those concerning an interest or capacity to act (see Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48609/06, § 88, 18 June 2013).
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 21727/08

  POST v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 39496/14

  It is essential for representatives to demonstrate that they have received specific and explicit instructions from the alleged victim on whose behalf they purport to act before the Court (see Post v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 21727/08, 20 January 2009; Nencheva and Others, cited above, § 83; and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu, cited above, § 102).
• EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 2959/11

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 39496/14

  Secondly, the present case was similar to the cases of Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania ([GC], no. 47848/08, ECHR 2014) and Association for the Defence of Human Rights in Romania - Helsinki Committee on behalf of Ionel Garcea v. Romania (no. 2959/11, 24 March 2015), in which the Court held that in exceptional circumstances and in cases involving allegations of a serious nature it should be open to associations to represent victims in the absence of a power of attorney, and notwithstanding that the victim may have died before the application was lodged with the Court.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 33050/18

  GHAZARYAN AND BAYRAMYAN v. AZERBAIJAN

  39496/14 and 39727/14, 26 April 2016).
• EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 52286/14

  ISAKOV v. RUSSIA

  In order to answer this question the Court has to decide whether the principles established in the Lambert and Others case are applicable in the present case and, more particularly, whether Mr Isakov can be considered a vulnerable person who was not able to lodge complaints to the Court himself (see N. and M. v. Russia (dec.), no. 39496/14, § 59; 26 April 2016).
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18860/07

  YABLOKO RUSSIAN UNITED DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  39496/14 and 39727/14, § 53, 26 April 2016; Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 102, ECHR 2014; and Post v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 21727/08, 20 January 2009).

• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 58221/10

  [ENG]

  39496/14 and 39727/14, §§ 51-55, 26 April 2016, with further references).
• EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 8559/16

  U.A. AND R.S. v. RUSSIA

  39496/14 and 39727/14, §§ 51-55, 26 April 2016, with further references).
• EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 24382/15

  ASGAROVA AND VESELOVA v. ARMENIA

  39496/14 and 39727/14, § 60, 26 April 2016).
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 59172/12

  G.J. v. SPAIN

  It is essential for representatives to demonstrate that they have received specific and explicit instructions from the alleged victim within the meaning of Article 34 on whose behalf they purport to act before the Court (see N. and M. v. Russia (dec.), no. 39496/14 and 39727/14, § 53, 26 April 2016, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 102, ECHR 2014, and Post v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 21727/08, 20 January 2009; as regards the validity of an authority to act, see Aliev v. Georgia, no. 522/04, §§ 44-49, 13 January 2009).