Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DYLLER v. POLAND

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05
• EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 39842/05

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 7870/04

  BAK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05

  Having regard to the foregoing and noting that the case did not belong to the category of organised crime (compare Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, ECHR 2007-... (extracts)), the Court concludes that the grounds given by the domestic authorities could not justify the overall period of the applicant's detention.
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05

  The Court recalls that the general principles regarding the right to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial, as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, have been stated in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI, and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 45219/06

  KAUCZOR v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05

  The relevant statistical data, recent amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure designed to streamline criminal proceedings and references to relevant Council of Europe materials can be found in the Court's judgment in the case of Kauczor (see Kauczor v. Poland, no. 45219/06, §§ 27-28 and 30-35, 3 February 2009).

• EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

  SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05

  Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, § 82, 8 April 2004; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 97, 4 October 2005; and Owsik v. Poland, no. 10381/04, § 34, 16 October 2007).
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 17584/04

  CELEJEWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the imposition of pre-trial detention (aresztowanie tymczasowe), the grounds for its extension, release from detention and rules governing other so-called "preventive measures" (srodki zapobiegawcze) are set out in the Court's judgments in the cases of Golek v. Poland (no. 31330/02, §§ 27-33, 25 April 2006) and Celejewski v. Poland (no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 August 2006).
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 39270/98

  BELCHEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05

  Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, § 82, 8 April 2004; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 97, 4 October 2005; and Owsik v. Poland, no. 10381/04, § 34, 16 October 2007).
• EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 57477/00

  MALIK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05

  This offence, although committed following the applicant's relapse into crime, can hardly be considered as giving rise to particular difficulties for the investigation authorities and the courts in determining the facts, mounting a case against the applicant and reaching a conclusion (see Malik v. Poland, no. 57477/00, § 49, 4 April 2006).
• EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 64284/01

  OLEKSY v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05

  In the absence of any evidence, the Court finds that the Government have failed to substantiate their contention that a cassation appeal against the judgment of the appeal court should be considered an effective remedy for the applicant's complaint under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Oleksy v. Poland, no. 64284/01, § 25, 28 November 2006).
• EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 10381/04

  OWSIK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 39842/05

  Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, § 82, 8 April 2004; Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 97, 4 October 2005; and Owsik v. Poland, no. 10381/04, § 34, 16 October 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen