Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BUCHA v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 4, Art. 4 Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80

  VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 43259/07

  Paragraph 3 serves as an aid to the interpretation of paragraph 2. The subparagraphs of paragraph 3 are grounded on the governing ideas of the general interest, social solidarity and what is normal in the ordinary course of business (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, § 38, Series A no. 70; Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany, 18 July 1994, § 22, Series A no. 291-B; and Zarb Adami v. Malta, no. 17209/02, § 44, ECHR 2006-VIII).
• EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 17209/02

  ZARB ADAMI c. MALTE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 43259/07

  Paragraph 3 serves as an aid to the interpretation of paragraph 2. The subparagraphs of paragraph 3 are grounded on the governing ideas of the general interest, social solidarity and what is normal in the ordinary course of business (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, § 38, Series A no. 70; Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany, 18 July 1994, § 22, Series A no. 291-B; and Zarb Adami v. Malta, no. 17209/02, § 44, ECHR 2006-VIII).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 43259/07

  The refusal to grant free legal aid to a party to civil proceedings may, under certain circumstances, also give rise to a breach of the Contracting Parties" obligations under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which comprises the right of access to court (see, for example, Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 26, Series A no. 32).
• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00

  D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 43259/07

  In accordance with the Court's case law, discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in relevantly similar situations (for recapitulation of the relevant principles see, for example, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 18.07.1994 - 13580/88

  KARLHEINZ SCHMIDT v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 43259/07

  Paragraph 3 serves as an aid to the interpretation of paragraph 2. The subparagraphs of paragraph 3 are grounded on the governing ideas of the general interest, social solidarity and what is normal in the ordinary course of business (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, § 38, Series A no. 70; Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany, 18 July 1994, § 22, Series A no. 291-B; and Zarb Adami v. Malta, no. 17209/02, § 44, ECHR 2006-VIII).

• EGMR, 25.01.2022 - 54780/15

  DANOIU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  Il souligne les similitudes entre la présente affaire et les affaires Van der Mussele c. Belgique (23 novembre 1983, §§ 32, 34 et 38, série A no 70) et Bucha c. Slovaquie ((déc.), no 43259/07, § 39, 20 septembre 2011).
• EGMR, 06.02.2018 - 7442/08

  ADIGÜZEL c. TURQUIE

  La Cour renvoie à sa jurisprudence pertinente en matière de l'article 4 de la Convention (Van der Mussele, précité, §§ 32, 34 et 38, Karlheinz Schmidt, précité, Siliadin c. France, no 73316/01, §§ 112, 115 et 116, CEDH 2005VII, Zarb Adami, précité, § 44, Rantsev c. Chypre et Russie, no 25965/04, § 283, CEDH 2010 (extraits), Steindel c. Allemagne (déc.), no 29878/07, 14 septembre 2010, Stummer c. Autriche [GC], no 37452/02, §§ 116 à 118 et 120, CEDH 2011, Mihal c. Slovaquie (déc.), no 31303/08, § 64, 28 juin 2011, Bucha c. Slovaquie (déc.), no 43259/07, § 39, 20 septembre 2011, Graziani-Weiss c. Autriche, no 31950/06, §§ 36 à 38, 18 octobre 2011, et Chitos c. Grèce, no 51637/12, § 79, CEDH 2015 (extraits)).