Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  RUSCHIH v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA and 3 other applications

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 49072/11

  GORELOV (II) v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 35348/21

  (a) Considering their medical condition, have the Government met their obligation to ensure that the applicants' or their relative's life, health and well-being (in all applications) were adequately secured by providing them with the requisite medical assistance as required by Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see Gorelov v. Russia, no. 49072/11, §§ 41-43, 9 January 2014; Kats and Others v. Ukraine, no. 29971/04, §§ 103-104, 115-116, 18 December 2008; and Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-140, 23 March 2016)?.

  (b) In application no. 35348/21 does the respondent State bear responsibility under the Convention for the applicant's infection with HIV (see Gorelov v. Russia, no. 49072/11, §§ 41-43, 9 January 2014)?.

• EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 28333/13

  TSELOVALNIK v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 35348/21

  40578/22 and 18571/23, did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints regarding medical assistance in detention, as required by Article 13 in conjunction with Articles 2 or 3 of the Convention (see Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 63-69, 8 October 2015)?.
• EGMR, 23.04.2013 - 52624/10

  HAGYO v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR - 35348/21

  In application no. 45689/22, was the applicant's state of health compatible with his continued detention (in view of the absence or presence of adequate treatment for his condition in prison)? In particular, did the domestic courts assess sufficiently whether the applicant's state of health had an impact on the grounds which justified his pre-trial detention and whether alternative measures could have secured his presence at the trial, in compliance with Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 93, ECHR 2000-XI; Hagyó v. Hungary, no. 52624/10, §§ 57-58, 23 April 2013; and Cosovan v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 13472/18, § 100, 22 March 2022)?.
• EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 13472/18

  COSOVAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 35348/21

  In application no. 45689/22, was the applicant's state of health compatible with his continued detention (in view of the absence or presence of adequate treatment for his condition in prison)? In particular, did the domestic courts assess sufficiently whether the applicant's state of health had an impact on the grounds which justified his pre-trial detention and whether alternative measures could have secured his presence at the trial, in compliance with Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 93, ECHR 2000-XI; Hagyó v. Hungary, no. 52624/10, §§ 57-58, 23 April 2013; and Cosovan v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 13472/18, § 100, 22 March 2022)?.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen