Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17, 72579/17, 73689/17, 3105/18, 7543/18, 9809/18, 11314/18, 21175/18, 45860/18, 50669/18, 56626/18, 57458/18, 4638/19, 12630/19, 23916/19 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17, 72579/17, 73689/17, 3105/18, 7543/18, 9809/18, 11314/18, 21175/18, 45860/18, 50669/18, 56626/18, 57458/18, 4638/19, 12630/19, 23916/19 (https://dejure.org/2021,39384)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.09.2021 - 69168/17, 72579/17, 73689/17, 3105/18, 7543/18, 9809/18, 11314/18, 21175/18, 45860/18, 50669/18, 56626/18, 57458/18, 4638/19, 12630/19, 23916/19 (https://dejure.org/2021,39384)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. September 2021 - 69168/17, 72579/17, 73689/17, 3105/18, 7543/18, 9809/18, 11314/18, 21175/18, 45860/18, 50669/18, 56626/18, 57458/18, 4638/19, 12630/19, 23916/19 (https://dejure.org/2021,39384)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,39384) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06
STANEV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17
Remaining complaints As regards the complaint under Article 5 § 5 of the Convention lodged by Ms Trukhina (application no. 4638/19), the Court reiterates that the right to compensation under the said Article arises if a breach of one of its other four paragraphs has been established, directly or in substance, either by the Court or by the domestic courts (see, among many other authorities, Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 182, ECHR 2012; Svetoslav Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 55861/00, § 76, 7 February 2008; and Çagdas Sahin v. Turkey, no. 28137/02, § 34, 11 April 2006). - EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 46404/13
KHLOYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17
The Court also finds that the domestic authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for example, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 96-107, 5 February 2015; Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, 10 May 2016; Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, 18 December 2012; and Isayev v. Russia, no. 20756/04, 22 October 2009). - EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 20756/04
ISAYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17
The Court also finds that the domestic authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for example, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 96-107, 5 February 2015; Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, 10 May 2016; Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, 18 December 2012; and Isayev v. Russia, no. 20756/04, 22 October 2009).
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 57319/10
SOPIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17
The Court also finds that the domestic authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for example, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 96-107, 5 February 2015; Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, 10 May 2016; Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, 18 December 2012; and Isayev v. Russia, no. 20756/04, 22 October 2009). - EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 78774/13
TOPEKHIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17
The Court also finds that the domestic authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for example, Khloyev v. Russia, no. 46404/13, §§ 96-107, 5 February 2015; Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, 10 May 2016; Sopin v. Russia, no. 57319/10, 18 December 2012; and Isayev v. Russia, no. 20756/04, 22 October 2009). - EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 28137/02
SAHIN ÇAGDAS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17
Remaining complaints As regards the complaint under Article 5 § 5 of the Convention lodged by Ms Trukhina (application no. 4638/19), the Court reiterates that the right to compensation under the said Article arises if a breach of one of its other four paragraphs has been established, directly or in substance, either by the Court or by the domestic courts (see, among many other authorities, Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 182, ECHR 2012; Svetoslav Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 55861/00, § 76, 7 February 2008; and Çagdas Sahin v. Turkey, no. 28137/02, § 34, 11 April 2006).